Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 10:13 AM Feb 2017

We were told repeatedly Trump wasn't taking intel briefings. It got troops wounded in Yemen

...got civilians killed. The botched raid destroyed an entire town.

This extraordinary Reuters article today confirms what NBC reported days ago:







Where are the calls for hearings and accountability on this ill-conceived, ill-prepared, botched raid that put our troops' lives at risk?
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

randr

(12,409 posts)
2. The last time a POTUS didn't pay attention at a security briefing was?????
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 10:32 AM
Feb 2017

We all are now living in the world created by Bush ignoring his briefing about Bin Ladin.
Heaven help us all.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
5. okay
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:33 PM
Feb 2017

It was probably too much to ask that he be informed about Pres. Obama's rejection of an identical raid.

Are we using Trumplogic here?

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
7. Obama didn't cancel the mission, he just delayed it and then left it for whoever was the next admin.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:57 PM
Feb 2017

the raiders were waiting for the next moonless night, which came when it did.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
8. he delayed it because of lack of adequate intel on the site
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:04 PM
Feb 2017
One of the three U.S. officials said on-the-ground surveillance of the compound was “minimal, at best.”

“The decision was made ... to leave it to the incoming administration, partly in the hope that more and better intelligence could be collected,” that official said.


...but you go with the moonlight thing.
 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
9. The moonlight thing is not mine, it is SEAL team 6's, and the raid planners, as reported by the NYTs
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:06 PM
Feb 2017

and NY mag.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
10. I think it's clear that a 'moonless night' didn't mitigate the stated lack of adequate intelligence
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:13 PM
Feb 2017

...but, like I said, you're free to believe moonlight was the only important or relevant concern.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
12. a handful of posts from you appearing to contradict the premise of the article
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:29 PM
Feb 2017

...that intel was inadequate and led to the tragic failure of the mission.

It's the president's job to sort all of that out before he gives his approval. Did Trump make certain the intel was adequate? He's made much about the quality of Pres. Obama's intel. Do you think he did enough to ensure the success of this mission?

I don't, and it follows a pattern of disinterest and arrogance toward the people charged with providing that intel.

None of that rises or falls on a 'moonless night.'

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We were told repeatedly T...