General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Yorker on Trump admin's "special cocktail of oafish incompetence & radical ant-Americanism"
Another great column from the New Yorker's Adam Gopnik:
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/13/trumps-radical-anti-americanism
Yet what perhaps no one could have entirely predicted was the special cocktail of oafish incompetence and radical anti-Americanism that President Trumps Administration has brought. This combination has produced a new note in our public life: chaotic cruelty. The immigration crisis may abate, but it has already shown the power of government to act arbitrarily overnightsundering families, upending long-set expectations, until all those born as outsiders must imagine themselves here only on sufferance of a senior White House counsellor.
Some choose to find comfort in the belief that the incompetence will undermine the anti-Americanism. Dont bet on it. Autocratic regimes with a demagogic bent are nearly always inefficient, because they cannot create and extend the network of delegated trust that is essential to making any organization work smoothly. The chaos is characteristic. Whether by instinct or by intention, it benefits the regime, whose goal is to create an overwhelming feeling of shared helplessness in the population at large: we will detain you and take away your green cardor, no, now we wont take away your green card, but we will hold you here, and we may let you go, or we may not.
This is radical anti-Americanismnot simply illiberalism or anti-cosmopolitanismbecause America is not only a nation but also an idea, cleanly if not tightly defined. Pluralism is not a secondary or a decorative aspect of that idea. As James Madison wrote in Federalist No. 51, the guarantee of religious liberty lies in having many kinds of faiths, and the guarantee of civil liberty lies in having many kinds of peoplein establishing a multiplicity of interests to go along with a multiplicity of sects. The idea doesnt reflect a weak desire for niceness. It is, instead, intended to counter the brutal logic of the playground. When there are many kinds of bullied kids, they can unite against the bully: Even the stronger individuals are prompted, by the uncertainty of their condition, to submit to a government which may protect the weak as well as themselves.
There is an alternative view, one long available and articulated, that America is not an idea but an ethnicity, that of the white Christian men who have dominated it, granting a grudging or probationary acceptance to women, or blacks, or immigrants. This was the view of Huck Finns pap, as he drank himself to death; of General Custer, as he approached Little Big Horn; of Major General Pickett, as he led the charge at Gettysburg. Until now, it has been the vision of those whom Trump would call the losers.
As the official ideology of the most powerful people in the White House, can that vision of America win? With the near-complete abdication of even minimal moral courage in the Republican Party, and the strategic confusion of the Democrats, all that Americans can turn to is the instinct for shared defiance, and a coalition of conscience, the broader the better, to counter the chaotic cruelty. (If the Koch brothers have some residual libertarianism left in them, let them help pay for it.) Few events in recent years have been more inspiring than the vast womens marches that followed the Inauguration, few events more cheering than the spontaneous reactions to the executive order on immigration, such as the cabbies strike staged after Kennedy Airport seemed to have been turned into a trap for refugees.
Such actions are called, a little too romantically, resistance, but there is no need, yet, for so militant a term. Resistance rises from the street, but also from within the system, as it should, with judicial stays and State Department dissenters. Opposing bad governments with loud speech, unashamed argument, and public demonstration is not the part thats off the normal grid: its the pro-American part, exactly what the Constitution foresees and protects. Dissent is not courageous or exceptional. It is normalits Madisonian, its Hamiltonian. Its what were supposed to do.
-snip-
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)A very important read - thanks for posting.
TimeToGo
(1,366 posts)But the line that says no one could have predicted rings a bit off.
Hekate
(90,645 posts)Good article. KnR
BumRushDaShow
(128,871 posts)THIS is why I sit here today in front of my computer, a descendant of slaves, but not one.
manicraven
(901 posts)Well stated!
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the whole community and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought, to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind. (my emphasis)
Live Free or Die, baby.
jeffreyi
(1,939 posts)That twitler is probably incapable of reading this (illiterate).