Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, let me get this straight (re: the raid) (Original Post) stevenleser Feb 2017 OP
Benghazi.... spanone Feb 2017 #1
You Would Be Able To See Fox News Explode From Jupiter. Grassy Knoll Feb 2017 #2
LOL SunSeeker Feb 2017 #13
Secretary Clinton would have never ordered such an ill planned event SticksnStones Feb 2017 #42
Quite a few more than those two were killed Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2017 #3
Hey, at least it didn't cut into President Trump's "me" time gratuitous Feb 2017 #4
blotus and his "me time".. Cha Feb 2017 #15
That reminds me of the now famous picture of Obama and Clinton trixie2 Feb 2017 #21
But, but, but OBAMA planned it. nt DURHAM D Feb 2017 #5
Maybe Chaffetz? world wide wally Feb 2017 #6
Post removed Post removed Feb 2017 #7
"The buck stops here". If the reports are correct, that mission should not have been ordered. stevenleser Feb 2017 #8
Interesting. PdxSean Feb 2017 #9
I agree with Steven - the CIC always should take responsibility rufus dog Feb 2017 #16
Mattis recommended the raid for political reasons. SunSeeker Feb 2017 #20
about 30 died. trump and his closest admin, people like brother in law, bannon killed these people Sunlei Feb 2017 #10
Mattis isn't the genius we thought he was. grantcart Feb 2017 #11
Mattis was the guy that left a group of Special Forces Blue_true Feb 2017 #34
Is anyone tired of winning yet? SunSeeker Feb 2017 #12
K&R ffr Feb 2017 #14
Steve.....this was supposed to be a spectacular capture raid msanthrope Feb 2017 #17
Yup, pure ego.nt zentrum Feb 2017 #18
Sadly the answer is actually yes.... PoliticAverse Feb 2017 #19
That was an aborted mission, so not comparable. SunSeeker Feb 2017 #23
It was a poorly planned and excuted mission which is why it had to be aborted. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2017 #25
It was never executed. SunSeeker Feb 2017 #26
It was aborted during execution of the mission. Things went so badly during execution that it was PoliticAverse Feb 2017 #27
You are wrong. The mission required a specific number Blue_true Feb 2017 #35
I'm not wrong. As you just admitted, the mission was aborted. nt SunSeeker Feb 2017 #40
Aborted Mission ! failed mission, why use pretzel logic here? uponit7771 Feb 2017 #41
Agreed. Fascinating that this person thinks the two are remotely comparable. nt stevenleser Feb 2017 #37
Not even remotely comparable. First off, we didn't kill any children in Desert One. stevenleser Feb 2017 #33
I've spoken with a Marine who was involved with Desert One. haele Feb 2017 #38
Yep, I heard similar information from the USAF Combat Controller I spoke with. stevenleser Feb 2017 #39
Ben-Ghazi rpannier Feb 2017 #22
You forgot Wall Street speeches and Fracking. Blue_true Feb 2017 #36
Kick Hekate Feb 2017 #24
This is how Generals Mattis and Dunford manipulated Trump underthematrix Feb 2017 #28
Dems need to play hard ball. When does the first investigation start? nt Quixote1818 Feb 2017 #29
Since we gave the Republicans control of Congress, there will be no hearings. yardwork Feb 2017 #30
Among other questions, I hope they ask why Trump was chatting on the phone with Putin Tanuki Feb 2017 #31
Is this really a surprise? bearssoapbox Feb 2017 #32

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
42. Secretary Clinton would have never ordered such an ill planned event
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 07:20 PM
Feb 2017

She would never have asked that of the SEALs


gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
4. Hey, at least it didn't cut into President Trump's "me" time
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 12:01 AM
Feb 2017

Can you imagine the toll it would have taken on the President if he had been in the Situation Room while this fiasco went down? Won't someone please think of the President and his feelings?

trixie2

(905 posts)
21. That reminds me of the now famous picture of Obama and Clinton
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 02:45 AM
Feb 2017

The looks on their faces show the reality of what happens and should reflect the responsibility of actions.


Response to stevenleser (Original post)

PdxSean

(574 posts)
9. Interesting.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 01:08 AM
Feb 2017

Who do you think should be held accountable when Trump authorizes a military raid without adequate intelligence?

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
16. I agree with Steven - the CIC always should take responsibility
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 02:05 AM
Feb 2017

Of bigger concern, Team tRump likely didn't learn anything.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
20. Mattis recommended the raid for political reasons.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 02:40 AM
Feb 2017

A touch of ODS mixed with a hack's desire to make Trump look like a hero and show he was better than Obama.

After two months of military preparation increasingly focused on the opportunity to capture al-Rimi, Trump was told by Defense Secretary James Mattis and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that his capture would be a "game changer," according to a senior White House official with direct knowledge of the discussions.

In making their case, they told Trump that they doubted that the Obama administration would have been bold enough to try it, this official said.


http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/yemen-raid-had-secret-target-al-qaeda-leader-qassim-al-n717616

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
10. about 30 died. trump and his closest admin, people like brother in law, bannon killed these people
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 01:48 AM
Feb 2017

Republicans let this happen.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
11. Mattis isn't the genius we thought he was.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 01:48 AM
Feb 2017

On the upside we don't have to worry about the POTUS getting weary from winning all the time.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
34. Mattis was the guy that left a group of Special Forces
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 05:03 PM
Feb 2017

Troops on their own, refusing to try to rescue them with Marine extractors. The Air Force had to send an extraction team from much farther away to rescue the troops, but by then, one had died from injuries.

ffr

(22,668 posts)
14. K&R
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 02:03 AM
Feb 2017

tRump is a TOTAL DISASTER. A bungler of king bunglers. A champion of all that's ignorant and wrong with politics today. And people are now dying because of it.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. Steve.....this was supposed to be a spectacular capture raid
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 02:08 AM
Feb 2017

that would have justified reopening a black site.....after all, you can't keep AQ #3 in lower Manhattan.

Trump wanted to show up Obama's Bin Laden raid.....you know, the one that took place right after Trump got his ass handed to him at nerdprom.

This was pure ego, nothing else.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
23. That was an aborted mission, so not comparable.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 03:01 AM
Feb 2017

What made it such a disaster was the loss of life in the aircraft collision as they attempted to leave, and the resulting political fallout. That tragedy was basically an air accident, not a poorly executed mission. No women and children were killed and it was not a poorly vetted and poorly executed mission that was done to show up a prior president, like the Yemen raid was.

After two months of military preparation increasingly focused on the opportunity to capture al-Rimi, Trump was told by Defense Secretary James Mattis and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that his capture would be a "game changer," according to a senior White House official with direct knowledge of the discussions.

In making their case, they told Trump that they doubted that the Obama administration would have been bold enough to try it, this official said.


http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/yemen-raid-had-secret-target-al-qaeda-leader-qassim-al-n717616

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
26. It was never executed.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 03:41 AM
Feb 2017

Mechanical failure of the aircraft led to the decision to abort, as your link notes. Carter got a bad rap on that.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
27. It was aborted during execution of the mission. Things went so badly during execution that it was
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 03:56 AM
Feb 2017

aborted.

The deaths occurred because the mission was executed and failed.


Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
35. You are wrong. The mission required a specific number
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 05:09 PM
Feb 2017

Of helicopters. It started with something like one more than was needed. A copter failed and became inoperable, the mission was to continue after the remaining copters were refueled, that is when a copter's rotor hit the refueling plane and both exploded into flames, at that point the mission was aborted.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
33. Not even remotely comparable. First off, we didn't kill any children in Desert One.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 04:03 PM
Feb 2017

2nd off, a hostage situation is an emergency/crisis situation. I know this one went on for a long time but you have no idea how the hostages are being treated or if they will be shot the next day. It's an emergency situation.

There was no reason to order the raid in Yemen that day. It could have stood another several days or weeks to plan. There was no emergency there causing a rushed operation.

Thirdly, if you talk to people who were actually on the ground during Desert One, and I had the opportunity to do that, they will tell you that the mission was thoughtfully conceived. As far as backup goes, eight helicopters were sent when it was indicated that only four or five were needed. There is a level beyond which you can't plan or you can't deem the planning insufficient. The battlefield makes very unusual things happen sometimes and you cannot account for everything. There is the famous saying in the military, no battle plan survives contact with the enemy. You plan as well as you can and then train the troops to improvise where necessary.

What Drumpf/Bannon/Flynn did here is simply fail to plan at all. That is not comperable to a plan that failed due to an unfortunate and unforseeable series of events.

haele

(12,646 posts)
38. I've spoken with a Marine who was involved with Desert One.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 05:32 PM
Feb 2017

"M" and several other units were alreadywaiting to get the signal the first group of 'choppers were on their way, and then they were supposed to start a mis-direction attack to draw attention away from the actual units that were going to go into the compound and rescue the hostages.
The three additional helicopters that started the explosions were apparently sent on site too soon due to the ATC at the base pushing stage 3 deployment out of sequence; they were supposed to pick up "M's" unit and the other Marine units once the hostages were gone.

The plan itself was sound. It was a over-excited Captain who messed the plan up by jumping the gun.

Now, for Yeman..., yeah - they were waiting for a moonless night. Or it was Obama's Fault for not making a big fuss about how utterly stupid and lacking in planning this "tactical strike" was when he refused to sign off on it.

Or maybe, a bunch of gun-ho Colonels and Just-got-my-Star Oafkeeper types thought they could make an easy statement for their fearless Leader and his crusade against the Muslims that aren't our friends, and didn't think it though much past "they're just a bunch of tribal thugs the Saudis have been beating up on for the past two years and we've got highly trained Special Forces that are trained for this".

Haele

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
39. Yep, I heard similar information from the USAF Combat Controller I spoke with.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 05:41 PM
Feb 2017

He had been on the ground in Iran at Desert One. In response to my queries casting doubt on the mission, he was adamant that the mission was well planned and had a high chance of success. A mission rated as having an 80% chance of success has a 20% chance of failure if just the right combination of things go wrong.

Knowing who those guys were and seeing that my questions were annoying him I didn't argue the point. It's not wise as a slick sleeved Basic Trainee, that's what I was at the time at Lackland AFB at the Chaparral when I ran into the guy, to pointedly question a special ops NCO. Besides, he was there and was trained to know whether something was well planned or not.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
36. You forgot Wall Street speeches and Fracking.
Fri Feb 10, 2017, 05:11 PM
Feb 2017

No need to point out that Trump packed in Wall Streeters and is trying to make the environment a sewer.

yardwork

(61,588 posts)
30. Since we gave the Republicans control of Congress, there will be no hearings.
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 04:22 AM
Feb 2017

The Democrats don't have the authority to order hearings. Good job, America.

Tanuki

(14,917 posts)
31. Among other questions, I hope they ask why Trump was chatting on the phone with Putin
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 04:26 AM
Feb 2017

and Mattis was partying with the in-crowd at the Alfalfa Dinner while this fiasco was unfolding.

bearssoapbox

(1,408 posts)
32. Is this really a surprise?
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 07:32 AM
Feb 2017

They don't care how many poor brown people they kill in America. Why should they care about the ones in other countries?

And troops are just so much sacrificial 'cannon fodder' to make 'merica GREAT again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, let me get this strai...