Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

monmouth4

(9,691 posts) Wed Feb 8, 2017, 08:51 AM Feb 2017

3

I am noticing quite a bit of eye-rolling and general dismissal of Joe's statements this a.m. from

Mika. She has been disagreeing and questioning his points to his frustration..LOL. Could it be over??? Joe was aghast this morning that Bannon is getting so much attention and is on the cover of Time. He just cannot figure it out. He so doesn't get it..

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am noticing quite a bit of eye-rolling and general dismissal of Joe's statements this a.m. from (Original Post) monmouth4 Feb 2017 OP

Strategic forgettery. After all, he doesn't want Kremlin Don irate with him JHB Feb 2017 #1

Joe, is always clueless. He looks for a R behind someones name, and then tries to justify everything RKP5637 Feb 2017 #2

but President alt.right Bannon gets it Achilleaze Feb 2017 #3

Colbert had a great clip on bannon being on the Cha Feb 2017 #4

JHB

(37,158 posts)

1. Strategic forgettery. After all, he doesn't want Kremlin Don irate with him

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Wed Feb 8, 2017, 08:54 AM

Feb 2017

Might make fundraising parties awkward.

RKP5637

(67,101 posts)

2. Joe, is always clueless. He looks for a R behind someones name, and then tries to justify everything

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Wed Feb 8, 2017, 08:55 AM

Feb 2017

they do. He never gets anything.

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)

3. but President alt.right Bannon gets it

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Wed Feb 8, 2017, 08:55 AM

Feb 2017

Cha

(297,029 posts)

4. Colbert had a great clip on bannon being on the

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Wed Feb 8, 2017, 09:05 AM

Feb 2017

cover of Time. Could Time have had an extra motive for the cover to needle trump?

'Cause I bet it's working out that way

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am noticing quite a bit...