Bannon is battling Pope Francis, and moderate and progressive Catholics.
There has always been a wide range of Catholic views, and the hard right are not the only "true Catholics" -- even though that's how they view themselves.
Bannon is associating himself with some far right Bishops, who are fighting Pope Francis.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/07/world/europe/vatican-steve-bannon-pope-francis.html?_r=0
Just as Mr. Bannon has connected with far-right parties threatening to topple governments throughout Western Europe, he has also made common cause with elements in the Roman Catholic Church who oppose the direction Francis is taking them. Many share Mr. Bannon’s suspicion of Pope Francis as a dangerously misguided, and probably socialist, pontiff.
Until now, Francis has marginalized or demoted the traditionalists, notably Cardinal Burke, carrying out an inclusive agenda on migration, climate change and poverty that has made the pope a figure of unmatched global popularity, especially among liberals. Yet in a newly turbulent world, Francis is suddenly a lonelier figure. Where once Francis had a powerful ally in the White House in Barack Obama, now there is Mr. Trump and Mr. Bannon, this new president’s ideological guru.
SNIP
The pope will maintain his direction and not be distracted by fights against those trying to undercut him, Father Spadaro said. “He moves forward, and he moves ahead very fast.”
He added that Mr. Trump’s ban on immigrants from certain Muslim countries was “opposite” to the pontiff’s vision for how to foster unity and peace. The pope, Father Spadaro said, is doing everything he can to avoid the clash of civilizations that both fundamentalist Muslims and Christians want.
= new reply since forum marked as read
and I don't love leaders easily, not even Obama, though I am a great admirer. In fact, this Pope may be the first.
It seems to me that Pope Francis is both conservative and, yet often acts as, a social liberal, and probably at least sometimes as an economic liberal, depending. His vast tolerance of many different cultures, generosity of spirit, and ability to work within traditional and hidebound systems, only pushing their boundaries judiciously, clearly indicate that he could not be the kind of radical leftist those ultraconservative bishops are no doubt claiming he is.
Socialist and communist? Liberals are usually shopping cart pragmatists--you use what works best in each situation, retaining the best of capitalism's energy here, adding in some socialism because that works better there... Etc.
Whatever, no labels actually needed. Just imagine the world if we all just took him as our role model. I'm smiling as I type this because he is who and what he is.
Is that the face of evil or what?