Get Ready: MSM Will Be Pulling Out All The Stops To Save Trump After Flynn Resignation

[stopbush]

They got him elected, and I will bet even money that they sat on a whole bunch of incriminating evidence about Trump being controlled by the Russians.

Harry Reid and others gave the press, the FBI and others the big opening to bring down Trump before the election. They sat on their hands. They did nothing. Rather, they demonized Hillary. They have shown no interest whatsover in pursuing the Russians rigging the election. No interest in looking into real vote fraud. No interest in anything outside of trying to normalize the madman.

We, the citizens of this country, need to stay in the streets, keep up the protests, push back and fight back at every level, if for no other reason than the fact that the majority of Americans hate Trump and want him out of office ASAP.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

1. Considering what's happening on CNN and MSNBC right now,

I don't think so. The New York Times, the Washington Post, and Newsweek have also been busting on SCROTUS lately.

[emulatorloo]

2. Watching MSNBC. Yes they are all over this story.

As another DU'er said, Flynn is just the first domino.

[pinboy3niner]

9. Both are staying live on the story this hour, too

FNC, meanwhile, is repeating Hannity's show on "The Immigration Crisis."

[flamingdem]

3. Sad. But you're right

Let's hear something about how Trump is obviously the person who directed Flynn.

Why would Flynn be motivated to act on his own? I call bs

[procon]

4. No, they'll go where the money is and they all smell blood in the water.

If this scandal keeps growing, and it will, the press is licking their chops and salivating over the prospect of taking Trump down because that story will sell. There's no loyalty about it, no one cares about Trump, only his ability to churn out top ratings which drives up ad revenues. This is strictly business and the bottom line profitability of the news.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

8. And there are surely some reporters out there

who want to be the next Woodward/Bernstein.

[procon]

11. Yes, and profit quite handsomely for their efforts for the rest of their careers. nt

[flamingdem]

5. However point being made now is that they can supoena him

and find out what happened - hmm

[drray23]

6. i dont think so.

The media has turned on Trump as of at least 3 weeks ago. They made the calculation that what Trump is doing is so outrageous, they have to address it. Of course, they also realized that Trump was trying to deligitimate them. The constant barrage of insults towards the media coming from the white house got them to change the way they deal with it. Besides, this is generating even more ratings than if they were going along with him. Both CNN and MSNBC are reporting record ratings.

[Frogg]

7. CNN TONIGHT

Link to tweet

[grantcart]

10. Nope chum is in the water

Reputations are going to be made and awards are going to be given.

This is what reporters live for.

More importantly this administration has leaks all over the place from obvious dissatisfied careerists.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

13. There could be multiple Deep Throats in this case.

The Nixon administration didn't leak much, but SCROTUS' outfit leaks like a soaker hose.

[BannonsLiver]

12. Nah, definitely not looking that way at all

[Phoenix61]

14. They will follow the money and ignoring this story is not where the money lies

[oasis]

15. Malcolm Nance on MSNBC says "there is no way Flynn acted

without Trump's permission". Nance says "This story will have a long reach".

[Eko]

16. The press flies where the dog lies.

That's all it is. Its not any coverup, or favoritism, its the smell of blood (ratings). The world is way simpler than you think it is.