Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ffr

(22,669 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 02:30 AM Feb 2017

U.S. lawmakers push for answers on Trump team's Russia ties - Reuters

A crisis over the relationship between President Donald Trump's aides and Russia deepened on Wednesday as a growing number of Trump's fellow Republicans demanded expanded congressional inquiries into the matter.
<snip>

Some experts expressed concern the White House could curtail or divert probes into Flynn and Russian involvement in the election unless Congress becomes more aggressive by holding hearings and appointing an independent commission or special prosecutor into whether Trump's team violated federal laws in their contacts with Russia.
<snip>

'VERY UN-AMERICAN'

In Twitter posts on Wednesday, Trump called the reported Russian connection with his campaign team nonsense and said the leaks were the "real scandal."

From early on in his White House bid, Trump said he would like improved relations with Putin, a stance criticized by Democrats and those Republicans concerned about Washington softening its stance after Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine and aggression in Syria. - [link:'VERY UN-AMERICAN' In Twitter posts on Wednesday, Trump called the reported Russian connection with his campaign team nonsense and said the leaks were the "real scandal." From early on in his White House bid, Trump said he would like improved relations with Putin, a stance criticized by Democrats and those Republicans concerned about Washington softening its stance after Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine and aggression in Syria.|Reuters]

And what did tRump say today, something to the effect that "he didn't order Flynn to talk to the Russian embassador, but it would be something that he would have asked him to do." Really? Is this your way of saying that you're okay with instructing your head of national security to offer aid and comfort to a hostile foreign power? We could hang you for that, literally. You know that right? It's called treason.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. lawmakers push for answers on Trump team's Russia ties - Reuters (Original Post) ffr Feb 2017 OP
It's time for a Special Prosecutor NBachers Feb 2017 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. lawmakers push for a...