Latin American history shows that populist nationalism is a recipe for national decline
A PRESIDENT is swept into office after whipping up a wave of grievance and resentment. He claims to represent the people against internal exploiters and external threats. He purports to refound the nation, and damns those who preceded him. He governs though confrontation and polarisation. His language is aggressiveopponents are branded as enemies or traitors. He uses the media to cement his connection with the masses, while bridling at critical journalism and at rebuffs to executive power. His policies focus on bringing short-term benefits to his political basehang the long-term cost to the countrys economic stability.
Donald Trump? Yes, but these traits come straight from the manual of Latin American populist nationalism, a tradition that stretches from Argentinas Juan Perón to Venezuelas Hugo Chávez and beyond. Yes, Mr Trump is a billionaire capitalist whereas Chávez was an anti-capitalist army officer. But populism is not synonymous with the left: conservatives such as Perus Alberto Fujimori used its techniques, too. Post-truth politics and alternative facts have long been deployed in Latin America, from Mr Fujimoris use of tabloid newspapers to smear opponents, to Chávezs imaginary coups and Cristina Fernández de Kirchners fake inflation statistics in Argentina.
So when they contemplate Mr Trumps first few weeks in the White House, many Latin American liberal democrats think theyve seen this movie before. And they know it usually ends badly. Some of the continents own populists, by contrast, recognise Mr Trump as a kindred spirit. Nicolás Maduro, Chávezs dictatorial successor, criticised a hate campaign against Mr Trumpthough that was before the United States this week blacklisted Venezuelas vice-president as a drug kingpin (an allegation Mr Maduro called baseless). Guillermo Moreno, the former official entrusted by Ms Fernández with producing Argentinas statistics, has identified a Peronist in Mr Trump, who is trying to do what we did.
. . .
Latin American experience teaches that populists are easily underestimated and can stay in power for a long time. But not forever. Populist regimes are often corrupt and spendthrift, and usually fail to make people better off. Whatever the example from the White House, Latin American history shows that populist nationalism is a recipe for national decline. That is the message liberals need to hammer home.
http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21717105-donald-trump-through-latin-american-eyes-peronist-potomac?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/belloaperonistonthepotomac