General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama ranked 12th best president by historians in new C-SPAN poll
It's the first time Obama was eligible for the Presidential Historians Survey, which asked 91 historians to rank all 43 former presidents across 10 categories. Those include "Pursued Equal Justice for All," in which Obama ranked 3rd, and "Relations with Congress," in which he ranked 39th.
Abraham Lincoln retained his top spot for the third time in the poll, which debuted in 2000 and last took place in 2009. Other consistently high-ranking presidents include George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, all of whom made the top five overall in each survey.
Also notable: George W. Bush bumped up three spots to 33rd since the poll's 2009 edition, while Bill Clinton stayed steady at 15th.
https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?page=overall
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/20/obama-ranked-12th-best-president-historians-new-c-span-poll/98149240/
Close to the top quarter. I would have rated him a bit higher, but I am biased. These lists are highly subjective, kind of like the list of the greatest in any field.
unblock
(52,195 posts)How is William Henry Harrison lower? How much damage could he have done in 32 days? I mean he was no donnie....
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I come up with my one sentence test:
Ike consolidated the gains of the New Deal, ended the Korean War, built the interstate highway system, and sent troops into the south to force them to comply with court orders to integrate their schools.
BTW, he would have loathed a mountebank like Drumpf.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)for the past 20 years really...and let's not forget his warnngs about the MIC in his Farewell Speech and remember that that warning came from a soldier.
3catwoman3
(23,971 posts)Oh, I beg to differ. Much lower.
unblock
(52,195 posts)If they ignore crucial things like "improving the lives of most Americans", and focus instead on things like "having an enduring legacy" or "having a lot of popular support", then Reagan fares pretty well.
Of course, you have to turn a blind eye as to whether that legacy is good or bad....
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)C-SPAN's academic advisors devised a survey in which participants used a one ("not effective" to ten ("very effective" scale to rate each president on ten qualities of presidential leadership: "Public Persuasion," "Crisis Leadership," "Economic Management," "Moral Authority," "International Relations," "Administrative Skills," "Relations with Congress," "Vision/Setting An Agenda," "Pursued Equal Justice for All," and "Performance Within the Context of His Times."
Surveys were distributed to historians and other professional observers of the presidency, drawn from a database of C-SPAN's programming, augmented by suggestions from the academic advisors. Ninety-one agreed to participate. Participants were guaranteed that individual survey results remain confidential. Survey responses were tabulated by averaging all responses in a given category for each president. Each of the ten categories was given equal weighting in arriving at a president's total score.
unblock
(52,195 posts)Public persuasion and vision/setting an agenda, e.g. But to my point, that says nothing about whether it's a good vision, e.g.
It's not enough that he loses a few points on equal justice. He put us on the wrong path, and he was a *worse* president because he was effective in doing so.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Seriously. This poll has to have been created by a Republican.
Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)No way he should be anywhere except last or close to it.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)There's no way Ike, St. Ronnie or Woodrow Fucking Wilson should be ahead of Obama. We can debate most of the others including Kennedy (brevity of administration) and LBJ (perpetuated Vietnam quagmire) as well, though I concede both were monumentally historic. As was Obama given his status as the first black president.
They also ding Obama for relationship with congress which was 100 percent the fault of the Republicans who plotted universal obstruction the night he was inaugurated.
We'll see what this list looks like in 10 or 15 years. I have a pretty good idea of who will be ranked dead last.
Cha
(297,136 posts)we know he'll always be in last place.
Thank you for sticking up for President Obama.. he sure as hell should be above Reagan.
Poll by c-span watchers.. lots of gop no doubt
I'll let better judges of Presidents decide that.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)As to Reagan I slept a lot easier when he was president. At least he paid lip service to liberal democracy, pluralism, and the rule of law.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)And I'm proud to do it. He's the greatest president of my lifetime and I don't know that I'll ever feel the same way about another politician again the way I feel about Obama. He is a treasure.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Wilson was a racist, but the reason he is rated so high is because he gave us Wilsonian Internationalism. Kennedy is rated so high because , well, he was martyred, and was the inspiration for Medicare, Medicaid, and the landmark civil rights legislation passed by his successor. Reagan is rated so high because he presided over a period of economic prosperity and had a message of hope and optimism. That is what an historian would say.
I would rate President Obama higher than Reagan, but I am biased. Any way, 12 out of 45 is pretty darn good.
Drumpf should get an *.
BannonsLiver
(16,369 posts)I'd love to ask the panel why they ding Obama so hard on Congress when even the Republicans admit their objective was to obstruct and destroy his presidency from day 1. Takes two to tango.
Anyway, these lists are mostly subjective bullshit.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)He basically saved the planet, just like the next Dem will need to, if there's anything left to save that is.