General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is there no Liberal Political Action Conference?
And why are there no think tanks that express liberal values and liberal expressions of family? Why is there no liberal equivalent of the Heritage Foundation or Americans For Prosperity? Why is there no liberal equivalent of the Family Research Council? How come we only get the conservative point of view on this stuff? I am really curious about this.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)edited to add /sarc off
and credit to Will Rogers
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)or maybe even longer.
Caliman73
(11,728 posts)Conservatism is something that can be harnessed and controlled because it is basically en emotional response to some sense of loss.
Liberalism/Progressivism while also emotional, is based on tinkering. It is based more on empiricism, trial and error. It is multifaceted. There are a lot of strains and a lot of projects the liberals are working on but there is no one single point that we are trying to reach. It is constant improvement and constant motion so that it cannot be contained in one structure.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)It's not as big as CPAC and of course it gets nowhere near the amount of free media coverage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netroots_Nation#2017
On edit: It used to be called Yearlykos
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)but, I have not heard much about it the past few years even though I frequent Daily Kos
ScubaSteve
(83 posts)Conservatives want the old days; whites in control like it used to be, Jim Crow laws for voting, blacks in their place, hippies arrested, homos in the closet, immigrants deported, women barefoot and pregnant.
So they need CPAC to remind themselves if they can just keep it together they can get it all back. They win; we lose; without realizing its a zero sum game. They cant see the forest for the trees.
I agree with Caliman73; as Progressives we continually move forward with an eye on expanding the human condition, as it is ever evolving. We are never trying to hold onto a moment in time but ever expanding our consciencness. We dont need a DPAC to get it back, as no enlightened being would ever want to revert to its primitive state.
And besides Fuck em!
dawg
(10,622 posts)We don't have their equivalent on the left because, in general, we aren't willing to lie and be intellectually dishonest in order to promote our agenda.
There are lots of honest, intellectually rigorous think tanks. And most of them tend to be left-leaning, because, you know, facts tend to have a liberal bias these days.
The real question is why you hear so little from these real organizations in the media.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)...now and 12 years ago...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1625535
...and 4 years ago...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022518174
Shouldn't DU be a force to make this happen?
Optimally it should be scheduled to allow time to influence local and state elections, with sessions on how to run for every office in every state: school board, water board, town council, county legislature, state assemblies, state senate...etc.
Plus, sessions on gerrymandering, majority D areas dominated by R representation, and sanctuary movements,
And just some good old dynamic lively liberal exposition.
I want someone to stand up and rouse up a crowd about positive liberal ideas!
Make it good to be a Liberal again.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)they just don't get the same amount of funding, and aren't media savvy enough to ensure their people are on the cable news EVERY day...
HAB911
(8,874 posts)they have very little in common, certainly not goosestepping
RedWedge
(618 posts)brooklynite
(94,483 posts)It's a fan convention.
BumRushDaShow
(128,740 posts)Every year, the GOP gets gobs of media attention about their agenda - all viewable by their "base", via these "conferences" - "CPAC", "Values Voters", "Faith and Freedom", etc. CSPAN laps these up.
There was an interesting article making that point a few years ago -
Molly Ball Jun 18, 2012
<...>
The past few years have seen an explosion of conservative get-togethers, a ceaseless national circuit of weekend meetups packed with speeches, strategy sessions, panel discussions, dinners and parties. The Faith and Freedom conference, now in its third year, in many ways duplicates the Values Voter Summit put on each fall by the Family Research Council. RightOnline, begun in 2008 to counter the liberal YearlyKos (now Netroots Nation), has analogues in the BlogCon and RedState gatherings. And upstart conventions put on by tea party groups or grassroots activists seem to spring up all the time. To make his appearance at CPAC Chicago earlier this month, Herman Cain had to cancel his appearance at the Conservative Leadership Conference in Las Vegas, while conservative news outlets found themselves pulled between those two and the concurrent Future of Journalism Summit being put on in Providence by the Heritage Foundation and the Franklin Center. "I can hardly keep up with them all," marveled Jerri Ann Henry, who handles digital outreach for the political PR firm JDA Frontline.
There are activist gatherings for the left -- Netroots is the big one, the liberal CPAC if there is one (this year's program featured Keith Olbermann and Elizabeth Warren). A nine-year-old progressive gathering, the Take Back the American Dream conference, was getting under way in Washington on Monday. But for Democrats, there has been nowhere near the proliferation of candidate cattle calls and ideologically oriented activist confabs recently seen on the right.
<...>
The constant conferencing has some obvious upsides for the conservative movement. It helps keep the base engaged, enthused, and working to build the kind of grassroots organization that has historically been Democrats' stronger suit. And while the flood of invitations can be wearying for Republican politicians, who must carefully pick and choose appearances based on whom they wish to appeal to and what message they hope to send, it's also a valuable opportunity for officeholders with their eyes on bigger things to build a profile outside their home states.
<...>
"We're not just playing around. We're not just shadowboxing," said Reed, whose rise as head of the Christian Coalition in the 1990s was derailed somewhat by his involvement in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal. The Faith and Freedom Coalition represents Reed's political comeback, and it's clear that his natural affinity for this type of work has not diminished. "We're playing for keeps," he added. "We're playing for the biggest prize in the history of the human race -- that's the United States of America -- and we are not going to lose."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/06/why-are-there-so-many-conservative-conferences/258637/
Poiuyt
(18,122 posts)Not just because we don't have an LPAC, but because Republicans are so good at controlling the message. We could take a page out of the their playbook. They treat politics as all out war while we try to play nice. It's nice to take the high road, but I'd rather we win some elections.
Most Americans believe liberal values and ideas, but only if they're not identified as Democratic. The Repubs have done such a good job of demonizing the adjective, "liberal," that people don't want to be seen as agreeing with a Democrat, never mind that it's in the person's best interest to vote for the Democrats in the field.
I think having a Liberal Political Action Conference would be a good idea just so we could control the message for a week. Americans are discovering just how bad Trump is, but he still has a very strong bully pulpit. We'll need all the help we can get to get out of this nightmare.