Trump wants nuclear arsenal at 'top of the pack'

[struggle4progress]

By Steve Holland | WASHINGTON

President Donald Trump said on Thursday he wants to ensure the U.S. nuclear arsenal is at the "top of the pack," saying the United States has fallen behind in its weapons capacity ...

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-exclusive-idUSKBN1622IF

This, of course, is why he has nominated the respected nuclear genius Rick Perry to head the programs

[ProfessorGAC]

1. Naturally Its About Raw Numbers With This Little Man

Efficiency, certainty of detonation, accuracy of targeting all favor the US arsenal by a light year, but he sees 6800 and 7000 and sees 2nd place
This concern will lead to a colossal waste of money

[Vinca]

2. If this isn't proof he's nuts, I don't know what is.

For decades presidents have been trying to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world. No wonder sales of bomb shelters and survival supplies are up.

[retrowire]

3. It only takes one!

Overcompensating with large phallic objects I see.

[secondwind]

4. We don't need MORE ... does this moron know what ONE nuke does?

[Setsuna1972]

5. I think we already have more than enough nukes

And exactly WHO are we going to be using them for ???

[dalton99a]

6. And animal scientist Rick Perry will lead us there