I have an open mind about "fake news"...

[kentuck]

All I ask is that I am told what "fake news" they are talking about? We get a generic "fake news" complaint without any context?

I would say to Donald Trump, if the sex "dossier" or the Russian "connection" story is "fake", then request that someone investigate it immediately and clear your name. Otherwise, the circumstantial evidence points strongly against you.

When they bellow on and on about "fake news", are we supposed to read their minds? How in the hell does anyone know what they are talking about? Give us examples so we can research and discuss individually on their facts and merits.

[HipChick]

1. Fake News - anything that is not postive news for WH, so it must be true..

is how I'm looking at it...

[kentuck]

2. With the information in the public spectrum...

we have no other way to look at it.

[OKNancy]

3. I have to admit... the New York Times posted some fake news about Hillary Clinton

Here is a Newsweek article about how they messed up on one particular email story: http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-new-york-times-emails-357246

[kentuck]

4. The "media" is far from perfect.

They need to be called on it when they are wrong. But, we need to know what story is called "fake news" before we can criticize or correct, in my opinion.