Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

icymist

(15,888 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:29 AM Mar 2017

Yesterdays NYT article tying Sessions, Bannon, and Miller planning all this together

ne night in September 2014, when he was chief executive of Breitbart News, Stephen Bannon hosted cocktails and dinner at the Washington townhouse where he lived, a mansion near the Supreme Court that he liked to call the Breitbart Embassy. Beneath elaborate chandeliers and flanked by gold drapes and stately oil paintings, Jeff Sessions, then a senator from Alabama, sat next to the guest of honor: Nigel Farage, the insurgent British politician, who first met Sessions two years earlier when Bannon introduced them. Farage was building support for his right-wing party by complaining in the British press about “uncontrolled mass immigration.” Sessions, like other attendees, was celebrating the recent collapse in Congress of bipartisan immigration reform, which would have provided a path to citizenship for some undocumented people. At the dinner, Sessions told a writer for Vice, Reid Cherlin, that Bannon’s site was instrumental in defeating the measure. Sessions read Breitbart almost every day, he explained, because it was “putting out cutting-edge information.”

Bannon’s role in blocking the reform had gone beyond sympathetic coverage on his site. Over the previous year, he, Sessions and one of Sessions’s top aides, Stephen Miller, spent “an enormous amount of time” meeting in person, “developing plans and messaging and strategy,” as Miller later explained to Rosie Gray in The Atlantic. Breitbart writers also reportedly met with Sessions’s staff for a weekly happy hour at the Union Pub. For most Republicans in Washington, immigration was an issue they wished would go away, a persistent source of conflict between the party’s elites, who saw it as a straightforward economic good, and its middle-class voting base, who mistrusted the effects of immigration on employment. But for Bannon, Sessions and Miller, immigration was a galvanizing issue, lying at the center of their apparent vision for reshaping the United States by tethering it to its European and Christian origins. (None of them would comment for this article.) That September evening, as they celebrated the collapse of the reform effort — and the rise of Farage, whose own anti-immigration party in Britain represented the new brand of nativism — it felt like the beginning of something new. “I was privileged enough to be at it,” Miller said about the gathering last June, while a guest on Breitbart’s SiriusXM radio show. “It’s going to sound like a motivational speech, but it’s true. To all the voters out there: The only limits to what we can achieve is what we believe we can achieve.”

<snip>
As the Republican primary season progressed, it became clear to Sessions and Bannon that Trump could be the vessel for their brand of Republicanism. Back in August 2015, Bannon emailed a friend, according to The Daily Beast, that while he felt good about other candidates like Ted Cruz, he was ready to pick Trump, because he was “a nationalist who embraces” Sessions’s immigration plan. Six months later, Sessions became the first senator to endorse Trump for president. Last August, Sessions helped create a new immigration policy for Trump, which called for reducing immigration by, among other things, tightening the rules about visas for high-skilled workers. That same month, Bannon took over Trump’s campaign.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/magazine/jeff-sessions-stephen-bannon-justice-department.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yesterdays NYT article tying Sessions, Bannon, and Miller planning all this together (Original Post) icymist Mar 2017 OP
Great write-up. dalton99a Mar 2017 #1
Holee cow. Sept. '14?? - many thanks for posting, icymist - wowjustwow, I had no idea - eom Leghorn21 Mar 2017 #2
In light of everything tonite this is quite a revelation. triron Mar 2017 #3
But how do we know what was said? Was there a witness who leaked this? nikibatts Mar 2017 #4
The point is that he lied murielm99 Mar 2017 #5
Republicans excel at nothing if not long term planning. procon Mar 2017 #6
The Koch's have zentrum Mar 2017 #7
Sessions, 45, Bannon, Farage, Marine LePen, Ilsa Mar 2017 #10
Lock them up! Botany Mar 2017 #8
The irony is .... Buckeyeblue Mar 2017 #9
For my husband, he has noted that Ilsa Mar 2017 #11
I've been with companied where IT workers were severed Buckeyeblue Mar 2017 #13
We've seen some of that, but not recently. Ilsa Mar 2017 #16
Big financial institutions still outsource Buckeyeblue Mar 2017 #17
Agreed. I suspect much is lost Ilsa Mar 2017 #18
I knew Sessions was awful, but didn't realize until I read this that awful is an understatement. femmedem Mar 2017 #12
republican treason against America sucks Achilleaze Mar 2017 #14
And they're getting away with it! Initech Mar 2017 #15
The Failing NYT is hitting a lot of home runs these days. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #19
K&R smirkymonkey Mar 2017 #20

procon

(15,805 posts)
6. Republicans excel at nothing if not long term planning.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 02:14 AM
Mar 2017

They've spent decades building rightwing think tanks, media groups and ALEC to take control of state governments and gerrymander in a permanent Republican power grab. Treasonous deals with Russia is not a surprising evolution of their MO.

I suspect they had no expectations of ever being caught, and never investigating anything because they practically control every part of govt. They've worked diligently to marginalize the press and make the public suspicious of truth and skeptical of actual facts when the choice of more lies and deceits that looks much more simple and appealing than the complex issues of the day. Trump is a never ending source of distraction and he has mastered the art of diversion to draw public attention away from him and point to another "attack" by his leftist enemies who are out to get him because we're all sore losers. Its been a convenient, if increasingly threadbare, cover.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
7. The Koch's have
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 04:13 AM
Mar 2017

....been building from the bottom up since the 50's. It's taken them and the Bannon-types 60 years to get this all centralized into control of virtually every institution in the country.

It seems to have appeared suddenly, but it's really a long-time underlying plan.



Ilsa

(61,691 posts)
10. Sessions, 45, Bannon, Farage, Marine LePen,
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:31 AM
Mar 2017

and others like them are part of Putin's psy-ops in taking down democratic govts.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
9. The irony is ....
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:23 AM
Mar 2017

That many of our lost tech jobs were lost to people who will never step foot in the country. Most financial institutions outsource IT functions to workers in India. Call centers outsource to many different countries. So tying immigration to jobs is just a smoke screen.

Ilsa

(61,691 posts)
11. For my husband, he has noted that
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:36 AM
Mar 2017

There are so many immigrants doing software work because, like harvesting crops, they can't find enough Americans willing or able to do those jobs. They are high-paying, but the jobs and the coursework are not exciting or sexy.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
13. I've been with companied where IT workers were severed
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 10:08 AM
Mar 2017

And their jobs were off- shored to India. I've worked with off- shore code writers on projects. Good people to work with. But I always come away thinking its8a shame that these jobs are off- shored.

Ilsa

(61,691 posts)
16. We've seen some of that, but not recently.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:14 PM
Mar 2017

The last time it happened anywhere close to hubbie's job, after six months they moved the jobs back here, but that was just one company.

I think employers really want local people for control of data, people, etc. But it has been difficult to find people (and I mean over the last five years) that want these jobs that are qualified to do the work.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
17. Big financial institutions still outsource
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 12:21 PM
Mar 2017

They keep a small domestic staff to oversee/qa/Approve new code and such. It's interesting. I think with current push to use an agile method for projects it makes it hard to have the technical portion of the team a half a world away.

Ilsa

(61,691 posts)
18. Agreed. I suspect much is lost
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 01:29 PM
Mar 2017

in coordination of projects when they cannot interact personally with each other. The teams coordinate better when they can socialize (over lunch, etc) occasionally.

femmedem

(8,199 posts)
12. I knew Sessions was awful, but didn't realize until I read this that awful is an understatement.
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:37 AM
Mar 2017

Having him as AG is horrifying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yesterdays NYT article ty...