General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYesterdays NYT article tying Sessions, Bannon, and Miller planning all this together
Bannons role in blocking the reform had gone beyond sympathetic coverage on his site. Over the previous year, he, Sessions and one of Sessionss top aides, Stephen Miller, spent an enormous amount of time meeting in person, developing plans and messaging and strategy, as Miller later explained to Rosie Gray in The Atlantic. Breitbart writers also reportedly met with Sessionss staff for a weekly happy hour at the Union Pub. For most Republicans in Washington, immigration was an issue they wished would go away, a persistent source of conflict between the partys elites, who saw it as a straightforward economic good, and its middle-class voting base, who mistrusted the effects of immigration on employment. But for Bannon, Sessions and Miller, immigration was a galvanizing issue, lying at the center of their apparent vision for reshaping the United States by tethering it to its European and Christian origins. (None of them would comment for this article.) That September evening, as they celebrated the collapse of the reform effort and the rise of Farage, whose own anti-immigration party in Britain represented the new brand of nativism it felt like the beginning of something new. I was privileged enough to be at it, Miller said about the gathering last June, while a guest on Breitbarts SiriusXM radio show. Its going to sound like a motivational speech, but its true. To all the voters out there: The only limits to what we can achieve is what we believe we can achieve.
<snip>
As the Republican primary season progressed, it became clear to Sessions and Bannon that Trump could be the vessel for their brand of Republicanism. Back in August 2015, Bannon emailed a friend, according to The Daily Beast, that while he felt good about other candidates like Ted Cruz, he was ready to pick Trump, because he was a nationalist who embraces Sessionss immigration plan. Six months later, Sessions became the first senator to endorse Trump for president. Last August, Sessions helped create a new immigration policy for Trump, which called for reducing immigration by, among other things, tightening the rules about visas for high-skilled workers. That same month, Bannon took over Trumps campaign.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/magazine/jeff-sessions-stephen-bannon-justice-department.html
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)triron
(21,994 posts)nikibatts
(2,198 posts)murielm99
(30,730 posts)about the meeting, under oath.
procon
(15,805 posts)They've spent decades building rightwing think tanks, media groups and ALEC to take control of state governments and gerrymander in a permanent Republican power grab. Treasonous deals with Russia is not a surprising evolution of their MO.
I suspect they had no expectations of ever being caught, and never investigating anything because they practically control every part of govt. They've worked diligently to marginalize the press and make the public suspicious of truth and skeptical of actual facts when the choice of more lies and deceits that looks much more simple and appealing than the complex issues of the day. Trump is a never ending source of distraction and he has mastered the art of diversion to draw public attention away from him and point to another "attack" by his leftist enemies who are out to get him because we're all sore losers. Its been a convenient, if increasingly threadbare, cover.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)....been building from the bottom up since the 50's. It's taken them and the Bannon-types 60 years to get this all centralized into control of virtually every institution in the country.
It seems to have appeared suddenly, but it's really a long-time underlying plan.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)and others like them are part of Putin's psy-ops in taking down democratic govts.
Botany
(70,483 posts)n/t
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)That many of our lost tech jobs were lost to people who will never step foot in the country. Most financial institutions outsource IT functions to workers in India. Call centers outsource to many different countries. So tying immigration to jobs is just a smoke screen.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)There are so many immigrants doing software work because, like harvesting crops, they can't find enough Americans willing or able to do those jobs. They are high-paying, but the jobs and the coursework are not exciting or sexy.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)And their jobs were off- shored to India. I've worked with off- shore code writers on projects. Good people to work with. But I always come away thinking its8a shame that these jobs are off- shored.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)The last time it happened anywhere close to hubbie's job, after six months they moved the jobs back here, but that was just one company.
I think employers really want local people for control of data, people, etc. But it has been difficult to find people (and I mean over the last five years) that want these jobs that are qualified to do the work.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)They keep a small domestic staff to oversee/qa/Approve new code and such. It's interesting. I think with current push to use an agile method for projects it makes it hard to have the technical portion of the team a half a world away.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)in coordination of projects when they cannot interact personally with each other. The teams coordinate better when they can socialize (over lunch, etc) occasionally.
femmedem
(8,199 posts)Having him as AG is horrifying.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)that is all