Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:01 PM Mar 2017

Why did Sessions say that he could not "confirm or deny that there was an investigation"??

Also, I think Comey has said the same thing?

Are they investigating or not? Is that too much information to divulge?

Comey should be a witness before the Committees, in my opinion. He needs to answer a few questions. Is he protecting Donald Trump in any manner? Does he have information or evidence that he is holding back from the Congress? Is he capable of pursuing an investigation that the people want and that is seriously needed? Who, in the Trump campaign, did he talk to before and after the election?

I fail to see the sterling reputation that the different Senators talk about?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Sessions say that he could not "confirm or deny that there was an investigation"?? (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2017 OP
Where exactly did the revelations about Sessions come from? gordianot Mar 2017 #1
b/c he is privy to most things, if he resigns we know he is in the cross hairs. juxtaposed Mar 2017 #2
That is code for "information is classified and cannot be shared " dixiegrrrrl Mar 2017 #3
That's the standard, by the book, DOJ and FBI response lapucelle Mar 2017 #4

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
1. Where exactly did the revelations about Sessions come from?
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:09 PM
Mar 2017

Was it an investigation Sessions as in a Party of others or the result of a conflict of interest since he would be in the lead of any investigations? He can deny an investigation all he wants.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. That is code for "information is classified and cannot be shared "
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:18 PM
Mar 2017

and also means there is an investigation ( 3 of them at least, now) because if there was no investigation it would not need to be classified.
Very common usage of the phrase.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
4. That's the standard, by the book, DOJ and FBI response
Thu Mar 2, 2017, 07:36 PM
Mar 2017

by long established protocol and best practices because refusing to discuss an investigation because it is ongoing would be implicit confirmation that there actually is an investigation.

Unless, of course, the the subject in question is Hillary Clinton. FBI Director Comey confirmed the investigation during the primary, and, in violation of standard FBI procedures, held an unprecedented press conference to exonerate Mrs. Clinton while excoriating her for "'extreme carelessness" as if that were criminal wrongdoing.

The usually circumspect Comey also made special concessions to publicly inform the leaders of a Republican-led witch hunt of what turned out to be extremely damaging, yet totally meaningless gossip and rank speculation 10 days before a presidential election. At the same time, Comey gave the Trump-Russia connection investigation every measure of discretion and confidentiality that is normally afforded by standard protocols.

Double standard, anyone?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Sessions say that...