Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Uber Used Secret Greyball Tool to Deceive Authorities Worldwide (Original Post) LisaM Mar 2017 OP
I'm impressed Renew Deal Mar 2017 #1
Yeah, well, cybernetting of data is very ubiqitous. LisaM Mar 2017 #2
holy crap! overt and systemic lying to law enforcement! unblock Mar 2017 #3
But nothing gets done about them. LisaM Mar 2017 #4
exactly. taxis have all these licenses and requirements, why should "ride sharers" be exempt? unblock Mar 2017 #6
I wouldn't exactly call uber ride sharing crazycatlady Mar 2017 #9
How the hell can it possibly be legal for a companies TOS Volaris Mar 2017 #5
5th Amendmwnt AngryAmish Mar 2017 #7
I keep forgetting corporations have the same Rights as I do. Volaris Mar 2017 #8

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
2. Yeah, well, cybernetting of data is very ubiqitous.
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:01 PM
Mar 2017

It helped promulgate fake news on social media and was one of the many things that influenced the election. They need to start teaching classes on it.

I don't know why people use this company, at least progressive people.

unblock

(52,116 posts)
3. holy crap! overt and systemic lying to law enforcement!
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:17 PM
Mar 2017

it's impressively bad enough to identify and avoid providing service to suspected law enforcement personnel, but to actually deceive them by showing them ghost cars and such?

wow, just... wow!

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
4. But nothing gets done about them.
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:21 PM
Mar 2017

People like convenience over ethics, I guess. I'm not actually against the concept of "ride sharing", but it's not ride-sharing at all, it's a sub rosa taxi industry that is skirting a lot of taxes and rules.

unblock

(52,116 posts)
6. exactly. taxis have all these licenses and requirements, why should "ride sharers" be exempt?
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:28 PM
Mar 2017

i was nearly killed in a taxi back in 1995 -- it stalled out in the middle lane of a freeway at night, we were rear-ended.
one of the three times in my life i was in a car without seatbelts. always been a fanatic, but this cabbie pulled away the second i got in the cab, before i realized there was no seatbelt in the back...

yet as much as i loathe taxis, i can't imagine ever using uber or lyft. my survival odds have to be better with a professional driver and a car that's regularly serviced, etc.

never mind the obvious ethical problems with uber/lyft's business practices....

crazycatlady

(4,492 posts)
9. I wouldn't exactly call uber ride sharing
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 06:07 PM
Mar 2017

Ride sharing is when your neighbor gives you a ride to the grocery store because he's going too.

With Uber, a driver goes out of the way to pick you up. It is basically turning the driver's personal car into an unlicensed taxi service.

I wish they would stop calling it ride sharing because it is not.

Volaris

(10,266 posts)
5. How the hell can it possibly be legal for a companies TOS
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:26 PM
Mar 2017

To include 'non-cooperation with law enforcement'

Volaris

(10,266 posts)
8. I keep forgetting corporations have the same Rights as I do.
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 05:36 PM
Mar 2017

But I bet like hell if you or I tried to 'non-cooperate' with law enforcement the Fifth Amendment would be rolled up and used to beat us about the head for a good little bit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Uber Used Secret Grey...