Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,200 posts)
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:07 PM Mar 2017

@nytimes--Don McGahn. Trumps Chief Council looking for FISA court surveillance order !!!!

lordy lordy--Trumpy has his lawyer looking for a FISA document --presumably to back up his lie about Obama wiretapping him.



Rick Hasen‏Verified account @rickhasen

Via this @nytimes report (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/us/politics/trump-obama-tap-phones.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share …) Don McGahn looking for FISA court surveillance order that may not exist

















Trump, Offering No Evidence, Says Obama Tapped His Phones


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/us/politics/trump-obama-tap-phones.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

By MICHAEL D. SHEAR and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT


MARCH 4, 2017



President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald J. Trump on Inauguration Day. Mr. Trump has praised Mr. Obama repeatedly since taking office. But on Saturday, he called his predecessor a “bad (or sick) guy.” Credit Damon Winter/The New York Times

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla....................


......But a senior White House official said that Donald F. McGahn II, the president’s chief counsel, was working to secure access to what Mr. McGahn believed to be an order issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorizing some form of surveillance related to Mr. Trump and his associates.

The official offered no evidence to support the notion that such an order exists. It would be a highly unusual breach of the Justice Department’s traditional independence on law enforcement matters for the White House to order it to turn over such an investigative document.

Any request for information from a top White House official about a continuing investigation would be a stunning departure from protocols intended to insulate the F.B.I. from political pressure. It would be even more surprising for the White House to seek information about a case directly involving the president or his advisers, as does the case involving the Russia contacts.

Last month, Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, came under fire for asking a top F.B.I. official to publicly rebut news media reports about contacts between Trump campaign officials and the Russian government.....................
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mcar

(42,307 posts)
1. I was in my early teens during Watergate
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:14 PM
Mar 2017

But studied it (and devoured "All the President's Men&quot in my college years.

This is bringing me back, but times 1000.

riversedge

(70,200 posts)
6. Someone--Trump, most likely really believes Obama 'wiretapped' The Towers. It is beyond
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:20 PM
Mar 2017

inappropriate for the WH to even ask for these FISA documents (which do not exist)!!

babylonsister

(171,057 posts)
3. Hahaha! That's not how it's supposed to work, make an
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:17 PM
Mar 2017

accusation and THEN look for evidence? Ack, these clowns are running (?) our country?

riversedge

(70,200 posts)
4. A White House Counsel nosing around a federal investigation of the President's campaign is by defin
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:19 PM
Mar 2017

This whole issue is so strange.



Robert Costa‏Verified account @costareports 2h2 hours ago

McGahn has reportedly told staffers to be very careful moving fwd and let his office handle things, citing classified/legal issues at stake
69 replies 313 retweets 494 likes




Rick Hasen Retweeted
southpaw‏ @nycsouthpaw 2h2 hours ago

A White House Counsel nosing around a federal investigation of the President's campaign is by definition not treading lightly.




Takket

(21,563 posts)
7. if it doesn't exist that will only convince 45 more
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:23 PM
Mar 2017

that it was an illegal conspiracy by Obama against him. remember that for paranoid trump and the delorables fantastic conspiracy theories are more believable than fact.

BumRushDaShow

(128,898 posts)
8. "would be a stunning departure from protocols"
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:23 PM
Mar 2017

They have followed NOT one "protocol" since he was elected.

leanforward

(1,076 posts)
9. I would hope he gets nothing.
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 09:56 PM
Mar 2017

It seems to me they are running scared.

Impeachment.

When you have a bed a coals covered in ash, an introduction of a breath of air/wind causes the glow and flame. pPrezident dRumpf is unable to shut up or stop.

It seems he is unable to contain himself from lashing out. I'm not privy to compartmentalized security data. But, based on what I read, the President can not order wire taps of citizens.

dRumpf has history with the russians back to 1987. His whole enterprize seems to be based on russian money. To me, that is why they have him by the "short hairs".

There is too much coincidental information/corroborated in what I read to suppose anything else.

I am a loyal citizen, in opposition to pRezident dRumpf and any GOP lemming.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»@nytimes--Don McGahn. Tru...