Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite House Attorneys Scramble to Come Up with Evidence to Back Trumps Wiretap Claims
AlternetIs the president reading conspiracy websites, or is he under FISA court surveillance?
Pres. Donald Trumps top legal advisers are scrambling to come up with evidence to back his claim on Twitter Saturday morning that the phones at Trump Tower were tapped in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election.
The New York Times reported Saturday evening that while Trump is spending the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida his fourth weekend away from Washington since he was inaugurated Jan. 20 a source reported that senior White House Donald F. McGahn II is spending the weekend trying to secure access to a court order that may or may not exist.
There are two possibilities regarding Trumps angry tweets from Saturday morning in which he accused former Pres. Barack Obama of wiretapping the phones in Trump Tower: One is that Pres. Trump is getting his news from right-wing radio and fringe conspiracy websites like Breitbart.com and InfoWars, both of which ran with a story on Friday alleging that Obama eavesdropped on Trump.
The other possibility, as suggested by Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu (CA), is that the president was under surveillance through an order from a FISA court. This would mean that a federal judge felt there was probable cause to believe that Trump had committed a serious crime or was an agent of a foreign power.
However, even if such an order does exist, the Times explained that it would be a major breach of the Justice Departments independence for the White House to compel it to turn over documents relating to an active investigation of itself.
Any request for information from a top White House official about a continuing investigation would be a stunning departure from protocols intended to insulate the F.B.I. from political pressure. It would be even more surprising for the White House to seek information about a case directly involving the president or his advisers, as does the case involving the Russia contacts, wrote Michael D. Shear and Michael S. Schmidt.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 905 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Attorneys Scramble to Come Up with Evidence to Back Trumps Wiretap Claims (Original Post)
Jimbo101
Mar 2017
OP
Wonder how many times Trump will send these lawyers on wild goose chases before they
riversedge
Mar 2017
#2
C_U_L8R
(44,998 posts)1. They look like idiots
and act like idiots too.
riversedge
(70,187 posts)2. Wonder how many times Trump will send these lawyers on wild goose chases before they
walk out???