General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite House Statement Plagiarizes ExxonMobil
A White House press release on a new ExxonMobil expansion appears to have lifted an entire paragraph from ExxonMobils press release on the expansion, The Washington Post reports. The two passages are identical, with the exception of the words United States, which appear in full in the White House statement and abbreviated in ExxonMobils release. Both passages laud ExxonMobils expansion into new facilities on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The ExxonMobil statement was released at 3:10 p.m. Monday, while the White House statement appears to have been released shortly afterward. President Donald Trump tweeted a link to the White House statement at 4:19 p.m. The Trump administration has direct ties to ExxonMobil, whose former CEO Rex Tillerson is now secretary of State.
READ IT AT THE WASHINGTON POST
###
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/03/06/white-house-statement-plagiarizes-exxonmobil.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
malaise
(268,949 posts)fucking morons
BumRushDaShow
(128,881 posts)Not an original thought in their heads.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,881 posts)ecstatic
(32,687 posts)that were announced 4 years ago, back in 2013.
But Exxons investment plan was launched in 2013 four years ago. And while the White House was hailing the investment program by ExxonMobil and talked about Trumps promise to bring back jobs to America, General Motors on Monday announced the layoff of 1,100 workers in Michigan.
Some oil analysts were not impressed. There is nothing new or newsworthy here, said Pavel Molchanov, energy analyst with the investment firm Raymond James. At the risk of stating the obvious, plenty of companies, across various industries, have been touting their U.S. job creation efforts in order to get on the Trump administrations good side even when the underlying job creation has little or nothing to do with Washington policy. This is simply the latest example of that.