Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 12:09 PM Mar 2017

House committees set to advance ACA replacement before knowing cost or how many lose coverage

By James Hohmann March 7 at 10:33 AM

THE BIG IDEA: The devil is always in the details. After years of waiting on Republicans to outline how they will translate talking points into reality, two House committees last night posted the specific language of legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. (The Ways and Means draft is here. The Energy and Commerce draft is here.)

The proposals let people stay on their parents’ plans until they turn 26 and forbid insurers from denying coverage or charging more to people with preexisting conditions. There would be no more individual mandate, but to prod people to pay for coverage insurers would be given permission to impose a surcharge of 30 percent on customers who have a gap between plans.

-- But here’s the rub: We don’t know how many people will lose coverage or how much this might blow up the deficit over time. What was released last night has not been scored by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. This is a big deal because both House committees with jurisdiction plan to take up the legislation tomorrow and advance the overhaul without this kind of formal analysis.

House GOP leadership created a “frequently asked questions” web site to accompany the draft legislation. One question is, “How are you paying for this plan? How much is it going to cost taxpayers?” This is the answer in full: “We are still discussing details, but we are committed to repealing Obamacare and replacing it with fiscally responsible policies that restore the free market and protect taxpayers.”

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/03/07/daily-202-house-committees-set-to-advance-aca-replacement-before-knowing-cost-or-how-many-lose-coverage/58be645ce9b69b1406c75d49/?utm_term=.c93e253a091b&wpisrc=nl_daily202&wpmm=1

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House committees set to advance ACA replacement before knowing cost or how many lose coverage (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2017 OP
"replacing it with fiscally responsible policies that restore the free market and protect taxpayers" vlyons Mar 2017 #1
Opinions coming in with what is known. More division among the masses, more pitting one against BeckyDem Mar 2017 #2
Biggest reason I fought against Trump .... genocide Jarqui Mar 2017 #3

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
1. "replacing it with fiscally responsible policies that restore the free market and protect taxpayers"
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 12:14 PM
Mar 2017

Translation = replacing it with fiscal policies advantageous to insurance companies and the potential for exorbitant profits, while turning tax payers into profit centers.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
2. Opinions coming in with what is known. More division among the masses, more pitting one against
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 12:19 PM
Mar 2017

the other.

Of course, the new GOP plan also allows insurers to charge older people five times as much as they do younger people. That might not matter for the 40-year-old making $50,000, but it will almost certainly eat up the extra funds a 60-year-old making the same amount would receive under the GOP plan.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/03/american-health-care-act-obamacare-cliff/518769/

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
3. Biggest reason I fought against Trump .... genocide
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 12:21 PM
Mar 2017

They're going to kill a lot of Americans.

It's ok for the GOP to spend trillions on avenging 3,000 Americans on 9/11 but they'll happily let tens of thousands die each year without healthcare so the rich can get their tax cuts.

I'll never accept that.

Bitter. Angry. Distressed.

These people that do this should not be in government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House committees set to a...