Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMexico cancels sugar export permits to U.S. because theres no one to negotiate with
http://www.salon.com/2017/03/08/unsweetened-mexico-cancels-sugar-export-permits-to-u-s-because-theres-no-one-to-negotiate-with/Wednesday, Mar 8, 2017 4:40 PM UTC
Unsweetened: Mexico cancels sugar export permits to U.S. because theres no one to negotiate with
The dispute reveals more real-world implications of the Trump administration's "deconstruction" of the government
Mexico has canceled sugar export permits to the U.S., citing a dispute over the pace of shipments. And the reason is likely because the Trump administration is eager to deconstruct the administrative state.
A letter sent by Mexicos sugar chamber to mills cited unfilled positions at the U.S. Department of Commerce as part of the reason needed to cancel the export of sugar. The Mexican chamber said it has encountered legalistic issues involving the sugar trade, and there were no U.S. counterparts in Washington with whom Mexican officials could negotiate.
Mexico is the top foreign supplier of sugar to the United States.
The cancellation comes at a time when President Donald Trump has indicated he will revamp U.S. trade policies. Since Trump took office, he has reversed the U.S. stance on the North American Free Trade agreement, which he sees as a trade deal that disproportionately favors Mexico.
Report Advertisement
The president of the Sweetener Users Association trade group, Richard Pasco, told Reuters that the Mexican cancellation will cause uncertainty in the marketplace.
We need adequate supplies and the lack of resolution is a problem, he told Reuters in a phone interview on Tuesday.
Staff positions across the U.S. government remain unfilled. This has created a difficult situation for Mexican officials who have sought to resolve a legal issue with the U.S. Department of Commerce.
As of March 1, Trump had filled barely half of the positions for which he is in charge of staffing something hes not particularly keen on doing.
A lot of those jobs I dont want to appoint because theyre unnecessary to have, Trump said. You dont need all those jobs. . . . Isnt that a good thing? Its not a bad thing.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 924 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mexico cancels sugar export permits to U.S. because theres no one to negotiate with (Original Post)
babylonsister
Mar 2017
OP
mindem
(1,580 posts)1. It is going to keep snow balling.
The whole drumph and republican clusterf..k is going to come to a head. Their mismanagement is going to really start hitting people in the pocketbooks and that will be the beginning of the end.
Bengus81
(6,928 posts)2. When the price goes sky high the Trumpanzies can blame Obama.....n't
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)3. Big Corn Syrup rubs hands gleefully, Big Diabetes SAD!!!
Fluke a Snooker
(404 posts)4. Actually, the LESS goons Drumpf adds to the reichstag the better...
The less control the repugs have of our US staff positions, the better.
babylonsister
(171,032 posts)5. Yes, but someone needs to negotiate. This
is just gross incompetence.