Afghanistan Is Now Trumps
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
MARCH 10, 2017
Before the White House responds to the Pentagons latest request for a troop surge in Afghanistan to counter insurgent forces that now control substantial parts of the country, it would serve administration officials well to examine the long history of deluded thinking about what could be accomplished if the United States committed more troops to the effort.
Back in 2007, Gen. Dan McNeill, the top commander in Afghanistan, pleaded for reinforcements to the force of 26,000 troops he led, arguing it was vitally important that the success Afghanistan has achieved not be allowed to slip away through neglect or lack of political will. His successor, Gen. David McKiernan, echoed that call the following year, asserting: We are not losing, but we are winning slower in some places than others.
In 2009, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the new commander, painted a more dire picture, saying that failure to send reinforcements could lead to an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible. That warning led the Obama administration to increase the American troop presence in Afghanistan to 100,000 from less than 30,000, and embrace a nation-building and counterinsurgency strategy that was meant to turn the war around in a few years.
Those efforts failed or fell well short of their aims. Afghanistan remains in the grip of a resolute insurgency and a kleptocratic, dysfunctional governing elite. The Afghan state has been rapidly losing control of districts across the country to Taliban factions and Afghan forces are getting killed and injured at a rate American commanders call unsustainable ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/opinion/afghanistan-is-now-trumps-war.html