Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 07:54 PM Mar 2017

Nursing Homes

Maybe its a demographic thingy, but here in the Deep Red, Deep Southern, Dumbfuckistan there are millions of people in nursing homes for long term care that their families, if any, can not provide. Most these People had some money and assets when they were admitted to the facilities, but unless u have assets that will generate at least $5-6K per month to pay for ur long term care it is not long before u are destitute and Medicaid is only thing that is keeping u in the Nursing home.

Funny u don't hear anyone talking about how these TrumpCare Bill cutting the Medicaid Funding is going to affect this Poor People.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lindysalsagal

(20,592 posts)
1. You're right: Since they can't get out and vote, screw-em.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 07:58 PM
Mar 2017

Trumpcare:
1. Quit your job.
2. Care for your aging parent.
3. Get sick and die, since you have no job and therefore no healthcare.


Amazingly simple.

IADEMO2004

(5,554 posts)
3. Oh they vote. We need to know who is helping them vote.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 08:41 PM
Mar 2017

Family? nursing home staff? local party officials?

marybourg

(12,598 posts)
2. The Medicaid programs that pay
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 07:59 PM
Mar 2017

for long-term care pre-date the Medicaid expansion. Unless all Medicaid is being phased out and not just the expansion, there should be no effect on long term care in the immediate future.

crazylikafox

(2,752 posts)
4. Medicaid is being block granted to the states. Over time that will kill medicaid.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 08:45 PM
Mar 2017

Money will go to states and the amount will not be raised after that. It will strangle the entire program, not just the expansion.

marybourg

(12,598 posts)
5. Is all of Medicaid being block granted in the
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 09:30 PM
Mar 2017

current Ryan bill or just the amount of money that is now going to the expansion?

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
6. Yes. It would have huge and unexpected effects.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 09:39 PM
Mar 2017
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/323252-gops-medicaid-block-grant-plan-should-trump-other-concerns

Shifting from “matching rates” to a block grant for Medicaid is not a new demand from the insurgent populist Trump, but the recycling of an idea that has been proposed by small-government advocates from Newt Gingrich to George W. Bush to Paul Ryan. In January, Kellyanne Conway made it clear that they will form a centerpiece of the Trump administration’s health care policy, and they have appeared in what Trump called on Twitter “Our wonderful new Healthcare Bill.”

SNIP

First, depending on the formula used to set the size of block grants, it could force immediate cuts in the states that have cast the widest safety net already. States that expanded Medicaid under ObamaCare and in prior policies spend more per resident than other states do today, so if a block grant change tomorrow gives each state a fixed amount per capita, these states would have to eliminate health coverage for many recipients to afford the new one-size-fits-all policy.

Second, block grants would set up a vicious political fight during the next recession. States feel the pinch of recessions the most because they have balanced budget requirements. Matching rates keep the safety net going by making it a bad deal to cut in hard times — states that cut Medicaid would be leaving lots of federal money on the table. This keeps the safety net broad when it is needed most. Under block grants, however, this disincentive to cut health care goes away, ensuring deep cuts by cash-strapped states.

This wouldn’t simply affect the poor families and the aged and disabled Americans who depend on Medicaid to reimburse their doctors, dentists, hospitals and nursing homes. They would face deep cuts, to be sure, but because healthcare providers who are part of Medicaid possess considerable political clout in statehouses, they would lobby hard to keep the safety net from being completely shredded.

SNIP

marybourg

(12,598 posts)
7. I came across this in:
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 10:48 PM
Mar 2017
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141727592

That legislation would roll back key elements of former president Barack Obama’s health care law, including its Medicaid expansion for low-income people. More significantly, the GOP bill would limit overall federal financing for Medicaid in the future. Taken together, those changes could reverse the Obama era’s historic health insurance gains.


Which seems to say that block-granting all of Medicaid would take place "in the future' and only the hated Obama expansion is being attacked now.

I don't think this bill is going anywhere fast, but if it did, the attack on long-term care would finish it off. Long-term care is one area where people who see themselves as middle-class come in contact with Medicaid through a spouse or parent who is in a nursing home under Medicaid.

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
9. The health care bill is being passed in phases. The Medicaid block grants will be in a later phase.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 11:41 PM
Mar 2017
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nursing Homes