General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo Mulvaney is saying the cbo estimate assumes
People give up their free Medicaid, which people won't do.
I thought it meant that people lose their Medicaid because the expansions are eliminated. I don't get their arguments.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Link to tweet
Given Mulvaney's history of lying, until he rebuilds our trust (by telling the truth for months or years), why should we believe anything he says?
Mulvaney is a functionary, installed by the GOP to destroy government so the rich can take more of American wealth.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)The same way he said it's "care" not "coverage" that matters. Too bad Mika couldn't have followed that up with "How are you going to provide care to those who don't have coverage"? She was so focused on getting her own question answered, she failed to see the obvious next question.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)All Ryan cares about is the budget reductions
wishstar
(5,268 posts)Budgetary Effects of Health Insurance Coverage Provisions
The $935 billion in estimated deficit reduction over the 2017-2026 period that would stem from the insurance coverage provisions includes the following amounts (shown in
Table 3):
A reduction of $880 billion in federal outlays for Medicaid;
Savings of $673 billion, mostly stemming from the elimination of the ACAs subsidies for nongroup health insurancewhich include refundable tax credits for premium assistance and subsidies to reduce cost-sharing paymentsin 2020;
Savings of $70 billion mostly associated with shifts in the mix of taxable and nontaxable compensation resulting from net decreases in the number of people estimated to enroll in employment-based health insurance coverage; and
Savings of $6 billion from the repeal of a tax credit for certain small employers that provide health insurance to their employees.
6