Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 12:41 PM Mar 2017

Here's why a court found Kellyanne Conway too unreliable to testify in Whole Foods lawsuit

TRAVIS GETTYS
14 MAR 2017 AT 12:38 ET

Kellyanne Conway has gained a reputation for untrustworthiness since going to work for President Donald Trump, but a federal court once found her polling work too unreliable to be considered in a lawsuit filed by the government against Whole Foods.

The Federal Trade Commission sued Whole Food in 2007 to block the grocery retailer’s purchase of the rival Wild Oats chain over monopoly concerns, and the company hired Conway’s polling firm to support its case, reported Business Insider.

The FTC found a series of internal company emails and public blog posts that showed Whole Foods wanted to acquire its competitor because Wild Oats held a “monopoly” in some markets.

Whole Foods hired Conway’s firm, The Polling Company, to design a survey to back claims by a former FTC official who often testified for companies involved in antitrust suits.

That former official, David Scheffman, argued that Whole Foods and Wild Oats shoppers frequently shopped at other grocery stores, so the organic grocers couldn’t raise prices without losing those customers to competitors.

more
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/heres-why-a-court-found-kellyanne-conway-too-unreliable-to-testify-in-whole-foods-lawsuit/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's why a court found Kellyanne Conway too unreliable to testify in Whole Foods lawsuit (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2017 OP
Here is link to the real article by Maxwell Tani that RipStory stole from snooper2 Mar 2017 #1
There's a link to the story right in the article... DonViejo Mar 2017 #4
Forever- Bunk fake "news" organization stealing material from actual journalists snooper2 Mar 2017 #5
I look forward to reading your attacks on... DonViejo Mar 2017 #6
They all employ authors and journalists snooper2 Mar 2017 #7
Nonsense... DonViejo Mar 2017 #8
There are no journalists at RawStory. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2017 #11
I know for a fact that article is incorrect... DonViejo Mar 2017 #14
Actually, Raw Story has the very best headlines if you want to post stories on Facebook womanofthehills Mar 2017 #12
A lot of newspapers provide content from the WaPo and NYT LeftInTX Mar 2017 #9
There is a link in the Raw Story article to Business Insider LeftInTX Mar 2017 #10
Agreed - I finally got a subscription to NYT and I pay for Randi Rodes podcast womanofthehills Mar 2017 #13
So the court deemed her a lying POS. dalton99a Mar 2017 #2
Awwww Verbose Matthias Mar 2017 #3
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. Here is link to the real article by Maxwell Tani that RipStory stole from
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 12:52 PM
Mar 2017
http://www.businessinsider.com/kellyanne-conway-trump-whole-foods-polling-testimony-2017-3

As an expert witness for Whole Foods, Kellyanne Conway gave testimony that was deemed 'fundamentally flawed' and thrown out


The court found that the FTC's expert witness, Kent Van Liere, presented compelling evidence about the study's drawbacks, which the agency said suffered "serious and fatal design flaws, poor execution, and conclusions that are inconsistent with the survey's results," and failed to "meet basic standards" of survey research.

"My overall opinion in this matter is that Ms. Conway's survey methodology and procedures are fundamentally flawed and render her data and results unreliable," Van Liere testified, according to July 2007 court documents. "In addition, it is my opinion that her survey does not provide a reliable basis to assess the issues associated with consumer perceptions of the substitutability of products and services across food retailers."

Van Liere said Conway's response rate was "so low that her results cannot be considered reliable" and included "unqualified respondents" who could not "understand or could not complete the questions accurately." Her response rate, according to Van Liere, varied "from 6 percent to 0.5 percent" of callers the pollsters attempted to reach, and over 20% did not reside in the zip codes designated in the survey.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
4. There's a link to the story right in the article...
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:02 PM
Mar 2017

How long will you continue to refer to RawStory as "RipStory?" You were provided with information last week proving they don't rip anything from anyone.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
5. Forever- Bunk fake "news" organization stealing material from actual journalists
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:06 PM
Mar 2017

Like Journalism doesn't have enough problems outside of assholes stealing from them.

Oh, and just because they have a single user Washington Post subscription doesn't justify their bullshit. If anything WaPo should get 90% of their clickbait ad revenue and they can keep 10%. That seems more than fair....


Do you work for them, get a cut or something? The vast majority of your posts are from RipStory

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
6. I look forward to reading your attacks on...
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:15 PM
Mar 2017

Talking Points Memo

The Huffington Post

The Associated Press

The UPI

Salon

The Washington Post

The New York Times

just to name a few

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
7. They all employ authors and journalists
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:24 PM
Mar 2017

writing a story and adding/linking to an original source is different than Rips Story outright stealing.

For example. Washington Post breaks a news story...other outlets will add to it as they do reporting and link to the original breaking story. Much different- screw RipStory

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
8. Nonsense...
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:29 PM
Mar 2017

I've read articles in the Washington Post and the New York Times linking to articles in other publications that I just happened to post on DU the day before those papers published anything about them.

And the journalists at RawStory will be delighted to know you don't consider them to be journalists.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
14. I know for a fact that article is incorrect...
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 02:13 PM
Mar 2017

and cannot be relied on for accuracy...just as the article itself states.

womanofthehills

(8,661 posts)
12. Actually, Raw Story has the very best headlines if you want to post stories on Facebook
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 02:09 PM
Mar 2017

If they rewrite a story, they do one of the best jobs of all the news sources in posting headlines. When news comes out that I want to paste to Facebook, I always use the Raw Story writers because they are almost like a NYC advertising agency the way they post an excellent headline. This is great for the Republicans on my Facebook who only read headlines - I bombard them with stories from Raw Story.

Raw Story is another good source off all the latest news in one place. I don't have to check 20 sources but can just go to Raw Story to get all the latest. I love that they update fast, unlike HuffPo which seems to leave the same stories up for half a day. If I want more detail, I can go to the source.

LeftInTX

(25,146 posts)
9. A lot of newspapers provide content from the WaPo and NYT
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:36 PM
Mar 2017

Our local one does as does many others, such as USA Today etc.

LeftInTX

(25,146 posts)
10. There is a link in the Raw Story article to Business Insider
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 01:42 PM
Mar 2017

When I read a Raw Story article, I usually click the links.
Not all of us have subscriptions to the WaPo or NYT which are paywalled.

womanofthehills

(8,661 posts)
13. Agreed - I finally got a subscription to NYT and I pay for Randi Rodes podcast
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 02:12 PM
Mar 2017

Do I have to pay for all my news.? Half the time, I can't read WaPo either and I'm tired of having to pay for news.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's why a court found ...