General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLouise Mensch has developed evidence that Wikileaks is an FSB/GRU front
And that the Russian server has the ability to deanonymize and track those who communicate with it. So it's a Kompromat tool.
Here are her conclusions:
* Wikileaks has handed Chayanov access to everything stored on its site and servers
* The Russian hacker and spammer can monitor traffic
* He can tell who is reading anything on the Wikileaks site anywhere in the world
* The Russian hacker has access to all documents that have been sent to Wikileaks
* He can probably bust the anonymity of any computer or user who thought they were anonymously donating to Wikileaks
* It is not reasonable to suggest that this hacker is other than linked with Russias GRU if he has it, they have it
* Through Julian Assange and his website, it appears that the Russian hacker and his government can track any readers of the Wikileaks site and any donors of material to it, thus allowing Russia to blackmail anyone who sent secrets to Wikileaks as a whistleblower.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)(this alone should have her winning an election HERE 90/10).
So the world's biggest thief and murderous dictator, Vlad Putin desperately does NOT want Clinton president.
So if you support Trump you support Putin, our enemy.
And yet, they do.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)This relationship has been hiding in plain sight.
rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)blew UP!
https://mobile.twitter.com/LouiseMensch?max_id=841736169075421185
....this investigation has been brewing for a while, but starting at the above link from earlier today, a woman named laurelai Bailey told her story - and one thing led to another - wow - sure sure sure do hope it's all true
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)I was on her feed when Chayanov deleted his account. Boy howdy, that made me take note! The whois sleuthing is solid - even I can see on my own machine that it's a Russian server. the notion that it's completely open to FSB/GRU is elementary stuff, but the implications are a bit numbing.
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)my tech abilities (for real) - but I was there too when Chayanov's account vaporized, and Louise was so ecstatic over it that I was, too! "Somethin' cookin' HERE, sports fans!" - giddy hope abounding now!
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)"Digital encryption won't save you from a state sponsored effort with physical hardware access."
"If you read Wikileaks, you're giving Russian Intelligence the ability to read/track you."
"Russian Hacker Peter Chayanov has the SSL keys to the entire site - and so does Putin"
"Submit secrets to #wikileaks, become an unwitting asset of Russian intelligence, which can then blackmail you for doing so. It's a feature!"
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Kaotic
(83 posts)It's an anonymous blogger..here's the link... https://patribotics.wordpress.com/
Link to the article she is quoting...
https://patribotics.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/wikileaks-hands-keys-to-putins-russian-hacker-readers-leakers-tracked/
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)The analyst is named Laurelai Bailey. The blog is only used by Louise. She refers to Laurelei in the third person, so even if the article doesn't have her name on it, Louise wrote it.
Throwing shade?
Kaotic
(83 posts)No shade...here's her Twitter account...
https://twitter.com/stuxnetsource
Not Louise Mensch.
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)First couple of paras:
Laurelai reported that the ultimate registrant of the servers was one Peter Chayanov, of Russia, a known cyber-criminal and hacker
That's Mensch writing this particular post.
Kaotic
(83 posts)She links to the articles from her Twitter account but that doesn't mean a thing. Where on the Patribotics blog site is Mensch given credit as the creator or author of content?
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)This is a pointless argument, dude.
Kaotic
(83 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)When everyone who follows her knows it is?
Kaotic
(83 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)How long have you followed her twitter feed?
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)Unsigned posts will be Mensch's.
Recently, she's enlisted Laurelai Bailey, some years back a key member of Wikileaks. Any posts by her will no doubt be signed "by Laurelai Bailey".
Kaotic
(83 posts)I don't see anyone's name on it.
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)She refers to and links to it frequently. It's where she self-publishes her longer-form material that doesn't fit with her other outlets (the Guardian's Comment Is Free., etc.).
Here's her current pinned tweet:
Link to tweet
Major breaking exclusive - why @Wikileaks Russian servers are MUCH WORSE NEWS than anybody thought #TrumpRussia https://patribotics.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/wikileaks-hands-over-the-keys-to-russia-and-vladimir-putin/
Kaotic
(83 posts)Why doesn't she have a link to Patribotics in her sidebar bio?
[img][/img]
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)where she publishes her research (and just recently, Bailey's).
A day or so following her feed would tell you this.
While you're tweeting her to ask why she doesn't link to it in her sidebar bio, maybe you can ask her why the Patribotics "About" page still reads
and the "Contact" page still reads
Name(required)
Email(required)
Website
Comment(required)
Kaotic
(83 posts)Excuse me for not believing but I'm skeptical of everything and it's not overtly obvious that it's her blog. But I kept digging and found this...so now I'm on board.
[img][/img]
Denzil_DC
(7,233 posts)Welcome to DU, BTW.
Kaotic
(83 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)But as I've discovered to my chagrin, it's far better to be a bit too skeptical than not skeptical enough. (I used to be a Snowden/Assange fanboi )
And welcome to DU!
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)spanone
(135,824 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Respectively