I honestly believe they are cutting airport security and embassy security (among

[joet67]

all the other cuts) to weaken us for another catalyzing event, which is what they need in order to resume the PNAC agenda. They don't *actually want to cut security, and will fully fund it again after the event. They just found a convenient vehicle to obscure it in, with the proposed drastic budget.

[bighart]

1. And if these cuts are made and some major event

occurs as a result we need to hold them to task for the blood that will be on their hands.

That is exactly how I am going to approach my senators and rep on this, tell them if they vote for the cuts and Americans die as a result THEY will be responsible for those deaths.

[joet67]

3. They need to be reminded that this is actually what occurred prior to Benghazi.

I wonder how Trey Gowdy will weigh in?

[still_one]

2. Your assessment looking for a catalyst event might be right, but I don't agree that their motives

are for a PNAC path. I believe their motives are dictatorial control of the US

[joet67]

4. Oh that's very true. I'm assuming the PNAC crowd will co-opt the situation either

before or after the fall of the Trump regime.

[still_one]

5. I say that because the PNACers are not fans of trump. They are nefarious in their own way

[joet67]

6. They sure are, and I can see them salivating as we speak. They'd like to step into

the void when Trump falls.