General Discussion

kpete

(71,984 posts) Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:44 PM Mar 2017

Nunes: Of "people working at WH now" none are under intel investigation or surveillance "BUT ONE"

Huh? Devin Nunes says of "people working at the White House now," none are under intel investigation or surveillance "but one."

Link to tweet

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nunes: Of "people working at WH now" none are under intel investigation or surveillance "BUT ONE" (Original Post) kpete Mar 2017 OP

Does he realise what he's done is completely illegal. sunonmars Mar 2017 #1

Isn't that obstruction? triron Mar 2017 #3

nunes is a hypocritical fucking scumbag JI7 Mar 2017 #2

Only one?? drats! riversedge Mar 2017 #4

None but one under intel investigation matt819 Mar 2017 #5

Go ahead Nuney baby, keep cheerleading for your boy. 2018 will be here oasis Mar 2017 #6

Sessions. Kislyak. Bring it. (n/t) FreepFryer Mar 2017 #7

Great and - once again - still no evidence of collusion. :( jmg257 Mar 2017 #8

sunonmars

(8,656 posts)

1. Does he realise what he's done is completely illegal.

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:44 PM

Mar 2017

triron

(21,999 posts)

3. Isn't that obstruction?

Reply to sunonmars (Reply #1)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:54 PM

Mar 2017

JI7

(89,247 posts)

2. nunes is a hypocritical fucking scumbag

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:46 PM

Mar 2017

riversedge

(70,189 posts)

4. Only one?? drats!

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:55 PM

Mar 2017

matt819

(10,749 posts)

5. None but one under intel investigation

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 05:00 PM

Mar 2017

What about criminal investigation - money laundering, etc.?

What about immigration investigation - Gorkha the Nazi.

oasis

(49,376 posts)

6. Go ahead Nuney baby, keep cheerleading for your boy. 2018 will be here

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 05:10 PM

Mar 2017

before you know it.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)

7. Sessions. Kislyak. Bring it. (n/t)

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 05:15 PM

Mar 2017

jmg257

(11,996 posts)

8. Great and - once again - still no evidence of collusion. :(

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 05:32 PM

Mar 2017

And in the mean time, they are concentrating on the crime of who leaked Flynn's name re: Russian communications.

Reply to this discussion