No judicial appointments while under criminal investigation.

[L. Coyote]

[BlueCaliDem]

1. Agree! Why should a 'president' under criminal investigation be afforded the rights of a true

president--especially when it comes to the judicial branch(es)? He shouldn't until the investigations are concluded and he's absolved. Period.

[world wide wally]

2. Consider this before casting a vote for Gorsuch, Dems:

IF you approve Gorsuch and Trump is found guilty of collusion with Russia to undermine our democracy, you will have allowed this Russian agent to appoint a SC justice for LIFE

[L. Coyote]

3. That should read 'before allowing a vote' ......... Dems need to filibuster all judical appointments

until the legitimacy of the 2016 election is known.

[2naSalit]

4. ...and all those fawning R Senators at the hearing right now

need to be investigated too.

[L. Coyote]

5. How many benefitted from the election crimes?

In a fair election, Dems likely would hold a majority in the senate and Clinton would be president right now.

[2naSalit]

6. They see it as

a dream come true with endless office-holding positions and ultimate power to foist their ideology on the rest of us.

[L. Coyote]

7. Plus, the end justifies the means, democracy be damned.

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[2naSalit]

8. Right?