Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPutins Chekist Cover Has Been Blown
I never expected to get two Watergates in one lifetime! What an embarrassment of riches. It couldn't happen to a more deserving band of brigands.
And now, some John Schindler:
Putins Chekist Cover Has Been Blown
Mondays marathon Congressional session about Moscows clandestine machinations during our 2016 election was one for the books. The directors of the FBI and NSA hardly ever speak jointly in open session, so this was a truly special event, and what they had to say rocked American politics.
Nevertheless, the most interesting statement made by Director Comey on Monday concerned what exactly the Russians were up to in 2016. They were unusually loud in their intervention, Comey said when asked by Florida Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen about novel Kremlin spy machinations last year during our election campaign: Its almost as if they didnt care that we knew.
Its an important fact that, when Moscow dispatched hackers to pillage Democratic emails last June, they employed groups that were already well known to Western security services as fronts for Kremlin spy agencies. Subtle, this was not. Someone in Moscowpresumably Vladimir Putinwanted us to know who was doing the dirty work.
Just as unsubtle was the Kremlins use of Wikileaks to disseminate those purloined emails to hurt Democrats. Since Wikileaks has served as a front for Russian intelligence since at least mid-2013as was glaringly obvious to anyone acquainted with Kremlin espionage and propaganda techniqueshere, too, someone at the top in Moscow wanted us to be aware of who was pulling the strings.
At every stage of their secret operation to influence our 2016 election, Russian spymasters could have used more subtle methodsfor instance employing clean hackers who were unknown to Western counterspies or putting stolen emails online on a fresh new websiteyet chose not to. This smacks of bravado and more than a little confidence that Washington would do little if anything to push back against Moscowan assessment that proved sadly accurate.
Mondays marathon Congressional session about Moscows clandestine machinations during our 2016 election was one for the books. The directors of the FBI and NSA hardly ever speak jointly in open session, so this was a truly special event, and what they had to say rocked American politics.
Nevertheless, the most interesting statement made by Director Comey on Monday concerned what exactly the Russians were up to in 2016. They were unusually loud in their intervention, Comey said when asked by Florida Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen about novel Kremlin spy machinations last year during our election campaign: Its almost as if they didnt care that we knew.
Its an important fact that, when Moscow dispatched hackers to pillage Democratic emails last June, they employed groups that were already well known to Western security services as fronts for Kremlin spy agencies. Subtle, this was not. Someone in Moscowpresumably Vladimir Putinwanted us to know who was doing the dirty work.
Just as unsubtle was the Kremlins use of Wikileaks to disseminate those purloined emails to hurt Democrats. Since Wikileaks has served as a front for Russian intelligence since at least mid-2013as was glaringly obvious to anyone acquainted with Kremlin espionage and propaganda techniqueshere, too, someone at the top in Moscow wanted us to be aware of who was pulling the strings.
At every stage of their secret operation to influence our 2016 election, Russian spymasters could have used more subtle methodsfor instance employing clean hackers who were unknown to Western counterspies or putting stolen emails online on a fresh new websiteyet chose not to. This smacks of bravado and more than a little confidence that Washington would do little if anything to push back against Moscowan assessment that proved sadly accurate.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1511 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putins Chekist Cover Has Been Blown (Original Post)
GliderGuider
Mar 2017
OP
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)1. And all the news media
help push the stolen hacked material. Instead of refusing to or make a disclaimer that this was stolen material hacked by Russia to help comrade Trumpski.
niyad
(113,049 posts)2. disturbing
MFM008
(19,803 posts)3. A writhing nest
Of maggoty republican traitors.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)4. He makes an acidic point about Snowden in the article.
Moreover, the Kremlin managed to convince millions of gullible Americans that the thief and defector Edward Snowden, who has lived in Russia since mid-2013 under the protection of Putins thuggish FSB, is actually an American patriot and defender of civil liberties. People dumb enough to buy that Moscow lie might fall for anything Putin threw out there, no matter how absurd.
Guilty as charged.
2naSalit
(86,323 posts)5. Good point...
I was for Snowden in the beginning but became truly unsure about him as time went on. I was having this conversation with a friend just hours ago.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)6. And this all began with Defector Snowden . . . n/t