Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 10:59 AM Mar 2017

Why Do The Media Believe Nunes Had Anything Of Substance At All?

It makes no sense at all to believe Nunes had any real information at all. Especially since he contradicted himself multiple times during the pressers.

All Nunes has done is go Ryan and the White House and then the Media and ALLEGE he's seen something. Something no one else has seen.

Unless he presents something real and credible to Schiff today, why not just say Nunes made the whole damned thing up and that explains his multiple nonsensical contradictions?

Furthermore, according to what Schiff said the other day- intelligence gathered from ANY two foreign business people under surveillance where they simply mentioned the words 'the President' would fit Nunes' description.

Nunes might not have anything at all and is simply making this up on direction of Bannon/Trump.

Or he might have been given an innocuous piece of surveillance by Bannon and told to pretend it's something more.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Do The Media Believe Nunes Had Anything Of Substance At All? (Original Post) KittyWampus Mar 2017 OP
I can see him on the TeeVee HipChick Mar 2017 #1
They like chasing shiny balls liberal N proud Mar 2017 #2
What can I say? Wounded Bear Mar 2017 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Do The Media Believe ...