Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,786 posts)
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 03:28 PM Mar 2017

You dont understand America: Lindsey Graham lectures town hall crowd booing Gorsuch

Speaking at a town hall in his home state, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) faced down boos and complaints from attendees unhappy with how Republicans failed to hold hearings on Judge Merrick Garland to fill Antonin Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court.

Making a pitch for Judge Neil Gorsuch, nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the seat left vacant by recalcitrant Republicans, Graham lectured the crowd as boos and grew and the crowd began chanting.

According to Graham, President Barack Obama was not entitled to fill the seat because, “Scalia died in February after three primaries had started a week before the South Carolina primary.””

“Everyone that boos Judge Gorsuch, you’re not persuading me at all,” Graham told the raucous crowd. “Matter of fact, if you can’t understand this is a qualified nominee, then you’re not listening.”

“If you don’t understand that elections matter, then you don’t understand America,” the lawmaker continued as the boos grew louder. “If you think that only liberals can get their nominees and a conservative can’t, then you don’t understand America. And I don’t believe that the Constitution was written so that you get everything you want and I get nothing. That’s not the way the Constitution was written.”


http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/you-dont-understand-america-lindsey-graham-lectures-town-hall-crowd-booing-handing-garlands-seat-to-gorsuch/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,419 posts)
1. And the Constitution clearly states that once primaries have begun, no one can be nominated.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 03:31 PM
Mar 2017

Where is that again, please? (I'm talking to Graham.)

 

Jonny Appleseed

(960 posts)
3. CLASSIC REPUBLICAN PROJECTION
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 03:32 PM
Mar 2017
If you think that only liberals can get their nominees and a conservative can’t, then you don’t understand America. And I don’t believe that the Constitution was written so that you get everything you want and I get nothing. That’s not the way the Constitution was written.


Did you forget the last 6 years?

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
11. Remember in '93 when they replace Thurgood marshall with Clarence Thomas?
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 05:06 PM
Mar 2017

They replaced a Liberal with a right-wing, extremist Conservative.

They did it because "elections have consequences" and the winners get what they want.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
4. I thought he was rude and condescending. I also think he assumes his Senate seat is a
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 03:46 PM
Mar 2017

sure thing forever and ever and ever.

 

FreeStateDemocrat

(2,654 posts)
5. Anybody that thinks Graham is not a perfect asshole puke is not paying attention to how he votes
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 03:58 PM
Mar 2017

every fucking time straight puke party votes, he is a piece of southern stinking shit.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
6. WHAT UNMITIGATED bullshit
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 04:03 PM
Mar 2017

from a RW ninny with double speak always coming out both sides of his mouth. This RW tool of racists, sexists, fascist will never have my respect no matter how he stood against RW health(death) plan. to hell with them all.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
7. We need a constitutional amendment for Presidential nominees.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 04:25 PM
Mar 2017

Senate must vote within 90 days. Only 51 votes to confirm. No filibuster allowable. If the Senate rejects the nominee, they have to come up with one of their own and confirm him or her (with a two-thirds supermajority vote) within 90 days, or their rejection is voided and the President's nominee takes office anyway.

Yes, this would allow a Republican president to appoint lots of people we don't like. But elections do have consequences. And our government can't function if both parties are allowed to obstruct each other ad infinitum.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
10. We need to take away the tools of obstruction.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 04:39 PM
Mar 2017

A minority party (even us), should not be allowed to gum up the works of the entire government just because they can.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You dont understand Ameri...