General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKaine (D-VA), Bennet (CO), Manchin (WV), Leahy won't block Gorsuch: please call them!
Last edited Tue Mar 28, 2017, 12:27 AM - Edit history (4)
[Updated from recent politico article]
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/gorsuch-supreme-court-filibuster-nuclear-236563
Ive always been for cloture, Manchin told Politico when asked whether he would vote to advance Gorsuchs nomination, even if he ultimately opposes him. Ive always been, basically, Im not going to filibuster.
But several other Democrats on Monday were much less definitive.
Sen. Jon Tester of Montana said he is still undecided, as did Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia said hes continuing to study Gorsuchs record and that the threat of the nuclear option wouldnt influence his choice. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), who like Nelson voted to break the filibuster on Alito, said Gorsuchs stance on privacy rights would be a central factor in her still-unmade decision on confirmation.
Im reviewing the hearings, said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), who is facing parochial pressure to back Gorsuch because the judge hails from Denver.
Even Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), who told a local reporter in Vermont over the weekend that he is not inclined to filibuster, quickly walked that back in a series of tweets Monday amid a flurry of constituent calls organized by liberal groups. The former Judiciary Committee chairman said Gorsuch will be blocked unless the judge provides real answers to written questions for the record. Those written responses from Gorsuch are expected back to the committee sometime midweek.
Please call, especially if you are from one of those states!
Kaine, VA
Bennet, CO
Manchin, WV: DC: (202) 224-3954; Morgantown, (304) 284-8663
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Justice
(7,185 posts)Sen. Patrick Leahy Verified account @SenatorLeahy 12h12 hours ago
As of now I do not believe I can support Judge Gorsuch. He did not answer basic Qs & was selected by extreme interest groups w an agenda
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)It's a bad choice for news.
Here's the link to the Vt Digger article which they based their article on: https://vtdigger.org/2017/03/27/leahy-will-not-vote-trumps-supreme-court-nominee/ The link was available in the Blaze's content. Note that their article is titled 'Leahy will not vote for Trumps Supreme Court nominee', not the inflammatory one used by the Blaze. They also do not suggest that Leahy's view on the filibuster will derail Schumer's plan to employ it.
I am not inclined to filibuster, even though Im not inclined to vote for him, Leahy said.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Yes, we all need to be calling tomorrow.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)So frustrating!!!
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)Now I have to call and thank him, which I do gladly.
JustAnotherGen
(31,811 posts)Bennet - hmm . . .
Manchin - not surprised. If I had to sacrifice ONE Democratic Senator - it would be him. He's only with us on labor and nothing else.
diva77
(7,640 posts)FEINSTEIN
http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe
Los Angeles
11111 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 915
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Phone: (310) 914-7300
Fax: (310) 914-7318
331 Hart Senate Office Building. Washington, D.C. 20510. Phone: (202) 224-3841. Fax: (202) 228-3954.
San Francisco
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: (415) 393-0707
Fax: (415) 393-0710
San Diego
880 Front Street, Suite 4236
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 231-9712
Fax: (619) 231-1108
Fresno
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4290
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: (559) 485-7430
Fax: (559) 485-9689
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I was there and he basically said since he would be replacing Scalia that dems should "save their fire" for the next appt. which could tip the balance.
However really you know, I mean I would have been really happy if Dems would have held up Clarence Thomas's nomination till Clinton won.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)If he votes to confirm Gorsuch, The GOP will just say that Garland is a non-issue for the next nomination.
BUT GARLAND IS THE PRINCIPAL ISSUE.
We need to make a stand here against this stolen seat.