Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mcar

(42,301 posts)
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 05:36 PM Mar 2017

Pierce: Do Not F*ck with Sally Yates

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a54171/sally-yates-testify-house-intelligence/

Here's a tip for you youngsters of the gaming persuasion. If a woman sits down at your table and tells you she's a lawyer who likes to relax with a little poker, and introduces herself as Sally Yates, run like hell and don't stop until you get to the Arctic Circle. It seems that the administration tried to block Ms. Yates from testifying to the House Intelligence Committee about what she knows concerning contact between departed White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and various Russian entities...

So why did Nunes simply cancel the committee hearing instead? That's where Ms. Yates' poker skills come into play. As you can see from the correspondence, Yates and her legal team explained to the White House lawyers that they didn't accept that she was bound by any claim of privilege, and that she was going to testify anyway, damn the torpedoes. At which point, the White House, and its hapless Night Stalker Devin Nunes, folded like cheap suits and canceled the hearings entirely...

The administration really had no choice. They could let Yates testify, in which case anything could happen. Or they could go to court and stop her, and look even more like they're trying to bury what she knows. (Maybe they could have sent federal marshals into the committee room to stop her. That would've been great TV!) Or they could duck and let Nunes take this in the face, which is pretty much what they did, because it's always Someone Else's Fault with this bunch...

Somewhere out there is the independent counsel that we need to get to the bottom of this murk and mire. I hear Sally Yates might be looking for work.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pierce: Do Not F*ck with Sally Yates (Original Post) mcar Mar 2017 OP
I GUARANTEE Sally will get her message out if that's what she wants to do. I'm also thrilled that napi21 Mar 2017 #1
I wonder if she will testify for the Senate committee? wcmagumba Mar 2017 #2
I bet she will mcar Mar 2017 #5
Trump administration sought to block Sally Yates from testifying to Congress on Russia L. Coyote Mar 2017 #3
They can't go two days without creating a mess mcar Mar 2017 #6
Nunes/committee invites her to testify. She agrees. The DOJ tells her she doesn't need jmg257 Mar 2017 #4
Not sure, but I think she has a "trump" card. MGKrebs Mar 2017 #12
Wrong game, for poker it's the Joker :) Pluvious Mar 2017 #25
She called their bluff and they folded. n/t dgibby Mar 2017 #20
Who's bluff? Nunes? DOJ? jmg257 Mar 2017 #22
The WH, and Nunes as a WH appendage. nt GliderGuider Mar 2017 #27
OK - so somewhere sometime, the WH told her she couldn't testify? They claimed privilege? jmg257 Mar 2017 #28
They tested the waters. GliderGuider Mar 2017 #31
I'm getting the analogy. What I have not seen is where the WH did all that. jmg257 Mar 2017 #32
So what is your point? MGKrebs Mar 2017 #40
Yes - I am saying I do not see where the WH resisted her testimony. I did not see a statement, or jmg257 Mar 2017 #41
Well if you are looking for a document, MGKrebs Mar 2017 #43
Yes - I do see those dots, the DOJ saying check with the WH, and Nunes doing whatever the hell jmg257 Mar 2017 #44
a new generation of Democratic leaders is rising greenman3610 Mar 2017 #7
During war promotions are given out on the battlefield as they're earned. That's what's happening TeamPooka Mar 2017 #8
It is exciting to see mcar Mar 2017 #9
And Congressman Ted Lieu, of California's 33rd Congressional District- Really making his mark now. NBachers Mar 2017 #11
Ted Lieu is a fantastic example - we need more direct and forceful messages against the regime. dalton99a Mar 2017 #19
Two words - Maxine Waters Cosmocat Mar 2017 #36
Al Franken belongs on that list also FakeNoose Mar 2017 #34
YES! True Blue American Mar 2017 #37
Great article. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #10
K&R. dchill Mar 2017 #13
Thank you for this from Charlie Pierce on our hero, Sally Yates, Cha Mar 2017 #14
according to one of the paid Trumpsters on CNN panel shows, Yates is running for Gabi Hayes Mar 2017 #15
I thought she was from Georgia? mcar Mar 2017 #16
She is from Georgia. MGKrebs Mar 2017 #29
I stand with Sally Yates Gothmog Mar 2017 #17
Will Trump set her up The Wizard Mar 2017 #18
I'd bet she's on the list. Along with Preet Bharara. lastlib Mar 2017 #21
Sally Yates, HRC, Rachel M., Maxine, Elizabeth W.---It takes a village...of WOMEN! WinkyDink Mar 2017 #23
Kirsten Gillibrand, Tammy Duckworth (and Baldwin), Kamala Harris mcar Mar 2017 #26
Gimme five! WinkyDink Mar 2017 #38
Oh yeah! mcar Mar 2017 #39
Sally Yates is a hero. We need her to run for office. nt SunSeeker Mar 2017 #24
A big K&R! William769 Mar 2017 #30
She might have to testify in the case. How about Preet Bharara as Special Prosecutor instead? tclambert Mar 2017 #33
Preet Bharara would be ideal FakeNoose Mar 2017 #35
K&R ismnotwasm Mar 2017 #42

napi21

(45,806 posts)
1. I GUARANTEE Sally will get her message out if that's what she wants to do. I'm also thrilled that
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 05:41 PM
Mar 2017

she told the AH's she wasn't bound by any confidentiality! MAKE 'EM SQUIRM SALLY!

wcmagumba

(2,883 posts)
2. I wonder if she will testify for the Senate committee?
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 05:43 PM
Mar 2017

They "say" everyone involved in Russia/drumph will be testifying. We'll see...

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
4. Nunes/committee invites her to testify. She agrees. The DOJ tells her she doesn't need
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 05:55 PM
Mar 2017

to check with them, but to check with the WH about "privilege".

The WH does not object to her testifying.

Nunes cancels the hearing.


Weird. But where is the poker playing analogy coming into it?


 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
31. They tested the waters.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:22 PM
Mar 2017

But they folded before it became a major confrontation. In the poker analogy, there was only one round of betting as far as I can tell. They bet, she raised, they folded.

Weak sisters with a weak hand. Sad!

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
32. I'm getting the analogy. What I have not seen is where the WH did all that.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:24 PM
Mar 2017

Was there some meeting we (I) don't know about?

Was the bluff via the DOJ?

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
41. Yes - I am saying I do not see where the WH resisted her testimony. I did not see a statement, or
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 07:59 PM
Mar 2017

a letter, or a ?? where they were asserting privilege.

It is a key point in those ongoing story about Yates' testimony, yet I have not seen a source for that assertion.

Do you have one?

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
43. Well if you are looking for a document,
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 08:16 PM
Mar 2017

then no.

But the DOJ (Jeff Sessions) throws up a couple of lame hurdles which Team Yates quickly overcomes and so the DOJ then defers to the WH. Coincidentally, WH minion Nunes cancels the testimony at that same moment.
Many would connect those dots.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
44. Yes - I do see those dots, the DOJ saying check with the WH, and Nunes doing whatever the hell
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 08:23 PM
Mar 2017

that was he did (cancel).

Thanks for the input!

greenman3610

(3,947 posts)
7. a new generation of Democratic leaders is rising
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 06:24 PM
Mar 2017

out of this

Yates, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Jim Times

TeamPooka

(24,221 posts)
8. During war promotions are given out on the battlefield as they're earned. That's what's happening
Tue Mar 28, 2017, 07:02 PM
Mar 2017

with us now.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
15. according to one of the paid Trumpsters on CNN panel shows, Yates is running for
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:14 AM
Mar 2017

governor of Alabama, IIRC. one of the treason states, anyway......

Lincoln's Big Mistake, as we in the north call what the pre-evolutionary revolutionaries call "The War of Northern Aggression"

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
29. She is from Georgia.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 12:20 PM
Mar 2017

There is speculation she might run for something here but that's all it is at this time.

lastlib

(23,208 posts)
21. I'd bet she's on the list. Along with Preet Bharara.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:23 AM
Mar 2017

(see your twenty and raise you a thousand..........)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pierce: Do Not F*ck with ...