Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 08:40 AM Mar 2017

No Future election forecast will ever matter until we address how they rigged this last one

And *YES* I do mean vote flipping. I am NOT just talking about voter files, or name purging...I am talking about them actually SWITCHING VOTES.

They did it...and deep down you know it.

Remember the aftermath and the fog of 2016? Remember all the motherfuckers shouting "prove it" and trolling *ANYONE* who spoke their mind?

Where are they now?

People who supposedly had such a principled and noble connection to the truth and the facts kept telling us that we needed to 'hone our message' and 'lick our wounds'.

Now that we know what some of us have been saying since JUMP, do you think that maybe...just maybe had we put our minds together on this, we could have prevented the electors from betraying our nation to the Russians?

Because Meredith McIver. Because the Trump Chumps on my social media feeds are putting pics of Maxine Waters right next to James Brown. They think that's funny.

And that's why we don't reach out to them. We SHOW them. We TELL them.

And until we recognize that this happened to us, we will not be able to prevent it from happening again.

86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Future election forecast will ever matter until we address how they rigged this last one (Original Post) LaydeeBug Mar 2017 OP
What happened last time killed all pretense that America is a representative democracy gordianot Mar 2017 #1
I recommend this discussion based on your title subject. peacebuzzard Mar 2017 #2
"How could voters in Minnesota elect Jesse Ventura?" brooklynite Mar 2017 #11
I have been shouting about this for years ProfessorPlum Mar 2017 #3
It was a systematic rigging. Initech Mar 2017 #4
It was a coordinated effort and pretending no votes were flipped will allow it to happen again. nt LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #64
This was a coordinated effort that the GOP participated in LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #5
"Future elections" might be an iffy concept Golden Raisin Mar 2017 #6
truly. I once said to a detractor of mine on here that this is going to come from the streets LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #8
When you figure it out, let us all know how it happened! jmg257 Mar 2017 #7
Sure. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #9
They didn't do it...and deep down you know that no authoritative figure says they did. brooklynite Mar 2017 #10
I beg to differ, sweets... LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #12
By frame the narrative you mean tell the truth right? mythology Mar 2017 #13
That isn't true, but you continue to tout it. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #26
Point to a statement that votes were flipped by the DNC Chair brooklynite Mar 2017 #16
I love how you think you are the arbiter of such things...but Tom Perez, on day FUCKING ONE LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #27
I am am the arbiter of the fact that you haven't provided a quote. brooklynite Mar 2017 #28
I forgot where it said I needed to....oh do you think YOU get to assign that to me? LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #29
So, absent any evidence to contrary, my statement stands... brooklynite Mar 2017 #32
as does mine... LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #43
wow... right, because computers nevvvver get hacked... don't even know what to say. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #48
K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2017 #14
so truth gets killed in order to coddle the criminals librechik Mar 2017 #15
THANK YOU! LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #44
%100 correct. frankieallen Mar 2017 #18
Senate Intel Report says the Russians didn't do it either. jmg257 Mar 2017 #19
The Senate Intel Investigation is still ongoing, but pretend some more LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #30
You do know there was an Intelligence report re:Russia released in January, right? jmg257 Mar 2017 #49
You do know there is still an investigation ongoing as we speak, right? LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #50
Oh of course. In the mean time, the DHS & the ICA assesses that the types of systems targeted jmg257 Mar 2017 #53
Anything "in the meantime" is irrelevant, but you already knew that. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #55
I know you keep saying they did. You keep pretending there is something there, which is irrelevant, jmg257 Mar 2017 #59
I know you keep thinking that no one has alluded to this other than lil ole me, but you're WRONG LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #60
Yes I need SOMEONE to say it AND back it up. Shouldn't be hard to do - please share what you know! jmg257 Mar 2017 #62
Good luck with your needs. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #63
No luck needed - I prefer facts (and there are plenty of those.) Thanks for your jmg257 Mar 2017 #66
Oh, I like facts too...which is why I won't be SUBMITTING to your goal LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #75
Thanks - read it - it's a great story! Not many facts - but a great anecdote none the less. jmg257 Mar 2017 #77
You're welcome. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #79
Exactly. your last paragraph is right on. nt m-lekktor Mar 2017 #21
The other side should have the burden of proof -- and can't meet it. Jim Lane Mar 2017 #25
THIS +10000000!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've been hoping that a law school class might take this on diva77 Mar 2017 #36
correct; we need all paper ballots, HAND-COUNTED, all the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #46
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2017 #57
+1 LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #65
you have NO evidence that it WASN'T hacked, because, oh yeah, the votes are invisible, TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #34
That's not how it works Bradical79 Mar 2017 #68
statement of fact: invisible votes means you can NEVER prove an election was/n't hacked. that, in TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #78
I'll choose to believe America's IC and not the Russia, Comey, voter suppression doesn't matter ... uponit7771 Mar 2017 #56
How can I find out how the Diebold "trashcan" ballot counter works? retrowire Mar 2017 #17
Exactly. Or "I'd love to ask them under oath" LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #31
Agree 100%! Lonestarblue Mar 2017 #20
paper ballot backup Left-over Mar 2017 #22
we need all paper ballots, all hand-counted, all the time. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #35
Far too many statistical anomalies in the Presidential election for it not to be a possibility... NoMoreRepugs Mar 2017 #23
I think it is more due to the Bradley Effect Tarc Mar 2017 #24
Possible. moondust Mar 2017 #33
agreed; it is beyond me why the dem PTB aren't all over this. quite possibly they TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #37
What did the GOP know moondust Mar 2017 #40
There is lots of info. out there on this diva77 Mar 2017 #38
Thanks. moondust Mar 2017 #41
I will not dispute that it could have happened ProudLib72 Mar 2017 #39
nobody has been able to prove that you can make a secure voting machine where computers r concerned diva77 Mar 2017 #42
There's different levels of security Bradical79 Mar 2017 #70
There is nothing MORE at stake than our electoral integrity. NOTHING LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #52
There is more to electoral integrity ProudLib72 Mar 2017 #72
I agree with you completely. 2nd the last paragraph, 1st sentence...spot on LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #73
Amen to that! kentuck Mar 2017 #45
ballots must be hand-counted the FIRST TIME, because 99% of the time, TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #47
When you say hand counted, what do you mean? HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #54
pretty much what you said; it's been done for centuries, it can certainly be done now. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #80
i agree! samnsara Mar 2017 #51
K&R! lunamagica Mar 2017 #58
From somebody who DOES this shit (holy fuck! am I tired of goal post movers) LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #61
I'm with you, Laydee librechik Mar 2017 #67
I am happy to find you. Truth will out. LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #71
The truth is out. former9thward Mar 2017 #74
Not yet...but you seem bothered...like it couldn't happen LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #76
I'm bothered? former9thward Mar 2017 #82
Yep...pretty bothered LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #83
but thanks for the kick. I appreciate. Maybe it'll save me from posting on it tomorrow LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #84
And that can't happen until Dems vote. Voting in KS and GA NOW, where are the Dems? Tom the Mechanic Mar 2017 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author ymetca Mar 2017 #81
K&R and Tweeted yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #85
I hope you realize that this talking point cedes all ground to criticize voter suppression loyalsister Mar 2017 #86

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
1. What happened last time killed all pretense that America is a representative democracy
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:04 AM
Mar 2017

Until some evidence shows the results of the last election are reversed we are level with actors such as Russian Federation and all authoritarian regimes on the planet.

peacebuzzard

(5,167 posts)
2. I recommend this discussion based on your title subject.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:05 AM
Mar 2017

I travel out of country frequently and foreign nationals routinely ask how could the U.S. Citizens elect this weirdo in the White House. The answer is so complicated and long I lose everyone trying to explain the electoral college, gerrymandering, popular vote and the issues separating the party systems.
This title subject is of grave concern. How can a whole voting system be repaired?

ProfessorPlum

(11,256 posts)
3. I have been shouting about this for years
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:09 AM
Mar 2017

and agree with you 100%. NOBODY KNOWS if our elections are real or not. And until we create federal standards that allow for a physical record of votes to be created, that can be kept, and recounted, and verified long after the electronic machines go "beep boop" and throw our votes into the garbage can, we will NEVER know.

Which is how the oligarchs like it.

Initech

(100,063 posts)
4. It was a systematic rigging.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:24 AM
Mar 2017

From top to bottom the whole republican party is in on the coup. The senators and representatives didn't care, and they know what's happening. The governor's were in on it, and the pundits got their talking points from the Heritage Foundation and whatever other insane billionaires will profit from the destruction of the government. And they successfully convinced the populace to go along with it. It may take decades, centuries even to sort this mess out.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
64. It was a coordinated effort and pretending no votes were flipped will allow it to happen again. nt
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:55 AM
Mar 2017
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
5. This was a coordinated effort that the GOP participated in
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:59 AM
Mar 2017

It's treason. It's espionage. It's a travesty.

Golden Raisin

(4,608 posts)
6. "Future elections" might be an iffy concept
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:04 AM
Mar 2017

with this Administration. A trumped-up (pun intended) war or a domestic terrorist attack may be all they need to dispense with pesky elections.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
8. truly. I once said to a detractor of mine on here that this is going to come from the streets
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:34 AM
Mar 2017

It isn't going to come from Congress.

The Russian hack of our election is by far the biggest story of our lifetime.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
10. They didn't do it...and deep down you know that no authoritative figure says they did.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:38 AM
Mar 2017

Bernie Sanders doesn't.

Hillary Clinton doesn't.

Barack Obama doesn't.

No Party Chair does.

No losing candidate does.

By falling on "we were robbed" arguments, you basically say we had a winning message and campaign that made the right tactical decisions. We didn't (and I say that a consistent Clinton supporter). That means we're not going to learn from our mistakes and fix them next time.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
12. I beg to differ, sweets...
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:51 AM
Mar 2017

The DNC party chair *did* say it.

But I don't expect that to stop you from trying to allow them to frame the narrative.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
13. By frame the narrative you mean tell the truth right?
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:01 AM
Mar 2017

There is absolutely zero evidence that votes were flipped. Clinging to that claim is really silly and is functionally no different than those who say global warming is a hoax or that evolution doesn't happen.

brooklynite

(94,502 posts)
16. Point to a statement that votes were flipped by the DNC Chair
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:08 AM
Mar 2017

I don't dispute that Republicans steal elections the old fashioned way; just not changes the tallies on voting machines.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
27. I love how you think you are the arbiter of such things...but Tom Perez, on day FUCKING ONE
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 03:59 PM
Mar 2017

said it. You're welcome.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
15. so truth gets killed in order to coddle the criminals
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:05 AM
Mar 2017

i'm tired of that routine in The United States. We question authority here, not fall in line with it.

And how do you know there's nothing there? The investigation hasn't even started.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
49. You do know there was an Intelligence report re:Russia released in January, right?
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 06:39 AM
Mar 2017
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections

"DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying."


But keep digging.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
53. Oh of course. In the mean time, the DHS & the ICA assesses that the types of systems targeted
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:29 AM
Mar 2017
"were not involved in vote tallying."

You might also want to refer to the ongoing (supposedly) House Committee investigation...

NUNES: Thank you, Director Comey.

Admiral Rogers, first I wanna go to you. On January 6th, 2017, the intelligence community assessment assessing Russian activities and intentions in recent U.S. elections, stated that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.

So my question as of today, Admiral Rogers, do you have any evidence that Russia cyber actors changed vote tallies in the state of Michigan?

ROGERS: No I do not, but I would highlight we are a foreign intelligence organization, not a domestic intelligence organization. So it would be fair to say, we are probably not the best organization to provide a more complete answer.

NUNES: How about the state of Pennsylvania?

ROGERS: No, sir.

NUNES: The state of Wisconsin?

ROGERS: No, sir.

NUNES: State of Florida?

ROGERS: No, sir.

NUNES: The state of North Carolina?

ROGERS: No, sir.

NUNES: The state of Ohio?

ROGERS: No, sir.

NUNES: So — so you have no intelligence that suggests, or evidence that suggests, any votes were changed?

ROGERS: I have nothing generated by the national security industry, sir.

NUNES: Director Comey, do you have any evidence at the FBI that any votes were changed in the states that I mentioned to Admiral Rogers?

COMEY: No.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/03/20/full-transcript-fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-on-russian-interference-in-2016-election/?utm_term=.25bce162e21e


So let's see - DHS, FBI, NSA, CIA...the ICA, all say no Russian vote swapping.

So please keep digging - we would all be very interested in what you come up with!
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
55. Anything "in the meantime" is irrelevant, but you already knew that.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:35 AM
Mar 2017

and by pretending "there is nothing to see here", you are enabling and normalizing this.

You can post every report from every GOP lead committee there is...the truth is...these machines CAN be hacked, and they were.

It's weird how, in the beginning, they were saying, "lick your wounds"..."hone your message"...this wasn't Russia at first, and now it's, "Well it was Russia, but they didn't hack any machines, and don't you dare say they did"

I'm saying they did.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
59. I know you keep saying they did. You keep pretending there is something there, which is irrelevant,
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:11 AM
Mar 2017

when everyone with actual in-depth knowledge of the situation says there isn't. Sorry - but right now I have to take the US IC over some unfounded non-fact-based internet theories.

Now you may be right about one thing - that the investigative reports may change - that somehow somewhere all the US Intelligence agencies have so far missed something. I'd be glad to change my opinion then. But in the mean time, the facts are there is no evidence, none никто nikto, that there was Russia vote switching.

Since you believe they did, maybe you can volunteer to appear before the various committees and tell all those involved what it is you know that they don't. They said all comers are welcome.

It would be extremely valuable for all of us to know what you are so sure of!


 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
60. I know you keep thinking that no one has alluded to this other than lil ole me, but you're WRONG
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:17 AM
Mar 2017

about that. That makes the rest of it tumble like bad jenga.

Voting machines can be hacked.

In this election, they were. You seem to think that "an authority figure" needs to say it before you will believe it.

That we should "hone our message"

We should "lick our wounds".

This shit is going to happen again if we don't start recognizing what went down here.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
62. Yes I need SOMEONE to say it AND back it up. Shouldn't be hard to do - please share what you know!
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:28 AM
Mar 2017

Please provide some evidence that the Russians hacked the vote tally. That would be vital!


Besides Russia, please just show that the voting machines WERE hacked - by anyone - that too would be valuable to know.

ETA: It would also help to know who else says they were hacked, someone that has some proof they can provide?

FWIW - it wouldn't take some overwhelming gigantic stretch of thought to buy in to the notion that tallies were hacked, so let's see the whens/hows/wheres it was done.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
66. No luck needed - I prefer facts (and there are plenty of those.) Thanks for your
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 10:56 AM
Mar 2017

theories, your keen insights, and your untiring diligence.

Just keep digging, you'll get there!

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
75. Oh, I like facts too...which is why I won't be SUBMITTING to your goal
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:39 PM
Mar 2017

posts.

Post #61 has some insight.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
77. Thanks - read it - it's a great story! Not many facts - but a great anecdote none the less.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 05:08 PM
Mar 2017

"Person A" and "Person B"...swapping theories about how 63+million people REALLY didn't vote for trump; I take it that means that few extra 1000s in swing states is impossible. It HAS to be "altered data of tabulated votes from about 10-15 precincts in the rust belt". Of course that theory would have to also include the notion that the exit polls were wrong (let me guess "only non-adjusted exit polls matter&quot .

So tell - does "Person A" just "believe"? Or can I take away from this conversation that there IS proof - that "Person A" has proof of this? And you are aware of this proof?

Great - share it!

Psst..was it the Russians??


They did get this wrong - trump also thinks there was wide-spread voter fraud...he yapped about it for weeks.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
25. The other side should have the burden of proof -- and can't meet it.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 03:25 PM
Mar 2017

First, as to the statement by mythology in #13 ("There is absolutely zero evidence that votes were flipped&quot : I'd say there's no direct evidence. If the matter were being tried in court, there is circumstantial evidence that would be admissible. Contrary to occasional popular usage, "circumstantial" doesn't mean "flimsy". It's a recognized and accepted form of evidence. It can even support a criminal conviction under the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard.

More important is that the court analogy isn't a good one. A plaintiff challenging the accuracy of a reported result would have the burden of proving fraud. In the court of public opinion, however, the key point is that we cannot be sure of the accuracy of our election systems. No system should be considered acceptable unless the evidence shows, maybe not to a certainty but at least beyond a reasonable doubt, that the reported results will be accurate. The current state of the evidence concerning voting in the United States does not show that.

My impression is that your post means that the challenges to the system should be disregarded unless and until the critics can establish theft of an election. If that's your meaning, I disagree.

I do, however, completely agree with your conclusion about learning from and fixing our mistakes. Against a candidate like Trump, our win should have been so overwhelming as to be beyond the ability of the fraudsters to undermine.

diva77

(7,640 posts)
36. THIS +10000000!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've been hoping that a law school class might take this on
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:05 PM
Mar 2017

in addition to whomever else out there is fighting to switch the burden of proof.

It is so easy to sneak malicious code, undetected, into these machines - whether they are DRE's, optiscans, central tabulators, etc.

Voting needs to be done with paper ballots on election day (no early voting except for absentees with extenuating circumstances), and hand tabulated at the precincts with oversight.

The Germans have rejected computerized voting -- would be interesting to see what persuaded them to do that...

I use the VW smog fraud scam as an example of how a computer can look like it's doing what you want, while actually doing the opposite out of sight, hidden in the code.

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
34. you have NO evidence that it WASN'T hacked, because, oh yeah, the votes are invisible,
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:03 PM
Mar 2017

and if you don't think that that in itself is a problem, i've got some real estate to sell you. i'm sorry, i am not a "faith based" voter; i want all hand-counted paper ballots, all the time. you are incredibly naive if you think that either the machines can't be hacked, or that "nobody would do that."

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
68. That's not how it works
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 11:11 AM
Mar 2017

If you make accusations on the basis of wanting people to prove a negative, you just come off as stupid and paranoid. It's actually damaging to efforts to insure electoral integrity.

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
78. statement of fact: invisible votes means you can NEVER prove an election was/n't hacked. that, in
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 05:09 PM
Mar 2017

itself, is a problem. that is my point; it isn't really about the "burden of proof." neither side can prove anything when the votes are invisible, for all practical purposes. that is an unacceptable situation, IMO. other people are apparently OK with is.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
56. I'll choose to believe America's IC and not the Russia, Comey, voter suppression doesn't matter ...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:39 AM
Mar 2017

... corner of the DNC.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
31. Exactly. Or "I'd love to ask them under oath"
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:21 PM
Mar 2017

They'd still lie anyway.

But vote were flipped.

Mark my words.

Lonestarblue

(9,971 posts)
20. Agree 100%!
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:38 AM
Mar 2017

We need a national voting system that is controlled by neither party, along with nonpartisan drawing of districts. Karl Rove's RedMap has done a lot of damage to our democracy, and unless something changes they will continue to destroy fair elections--by whatever means necessary, including in the vote counts--until they achieve their goal of one-party Republican rule. They're already close in control of enough states to start pushing for a Constitutional Convention at which they could try to get rid of our form of government entirely. While we have not been able to prove Republican cheating, we do need to assume that their goal is to destroy Democrats and fight back with all we've got.

Left-over

(234 posts)
22. paper ballot backup
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:39 AM
Mar 2017

Why don't we use paper ballots and then scan them to digital and count both to make sure they match up?

moondust

(19,972 posts)
33. Possible.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:54 PM
Mar 2017

I don't know if TPTB have investigated the possibility that the electronic voting machines and/or tabulators may have a back door built in that could allow somebody to secretly gain access and modify vote totals without anybody knowing it. Have they questioned any experts on electronic voting machines, tabulators, and relevant networking? Could a programmer at the manufacturer create a back door and then quietly pass along details on how to access it? Maybe for a hefty price?

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
37. agreed; it is beyond me why the dem PTB aren't all over this. quite possibly they
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:09 PM
Mar 2017

are simply ignorant of the technical details of these machine and how easy they are to hack, i don't get it, but sadly, if nothing was done after 2000, nothing is going to be done now. and now that the repug/russian PTB see how easy it was to install their puppet, they're only going to up the scale of their operation next time.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
40. What did the GOP know
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:26 PM
Mar 2017

and when did they know it?

Did they refuse to act on Merrick Garland and other issues because they knew the next election was in the bag thanks to their secret plan? In a sane world seven years of mindless political obstruction would have earned them a long stretch in political irrelevance--the exact opposite of what they got.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
41. Thanks.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:30 PM
Mar 2017

Hopefully the investigations will get some good input from these folks who have been looking at this stuff for years.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
39. I will not dispute that it could have happened
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:23 PM
Mar 2017

There was that video making the rounds last week of the guy who worked for Exxon and NASA who created a vote flipping program that was nearly impossible to detect. So, yes, anything is possible.

However, there is more at stake here. tRump should never NEVER have passed scrutiny. He should never have been able to run in the first place. You can make a secure voting machine, but it does not guarantee that the candidates are, themselves, secure. tRump made it with ties to the mafia, hundreds of lawsuits against him, questionable mental health, etc. I think this is what foreign countries are responding to. Yes, the election was rigged, but MY GOD...tRump??!!!

At this point, I am much more concerned about the vetting of presidential candidates than I am about whether there actually was a vote flipping program.

diva77

(7,640 posts)
42. nobody has been able to prove that you can make a secure voting machine where computers r concerned
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:36 PM
Mar 2017

I agree with you too about vetting of presidential candidates

Dems tend to follow the rules and procedures, even if there is a lapse, no matter how egregious, in procedure caused by repubs -- that seems to be how we got to where we are with Gorsuch hearings, for example; too bad Dems don't shut things down when there is a lapse in procedure

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
70. There's different levels of security
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 11:18 AM
Mar 2017

If voting machines aren't networked, it seems to me hacking those machines would require even more effort than physically stuffing balot boxes with paper ballots or having people in place to fudge the count. If hacking were involved, I think you need to worry about the source code or someplace else where someone getting into a network can affect larger numbers of votes or voting machines. And also look at companies themselves that could be compromised or have serious conflicts of interest.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
52. There is nothing MORE at stake than our electoral integrity. NOTHING
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:26 AM
Mar 2017

Trump "should not have made it to this point" is trifle talk because he was propped up by the greedia and the KGB.

Yes...the election was rigged...and my God...Trump. THAT'S what they wanted, and since we are too busy commencing with a circular firing squad when we bring up their efforts (and I am not saying it was JUST some vote flipping....but there was definitely *some*...as part of a coordinated effort)

But that's what's happening, and I really feel like these people are trying to insure it happens again by throwing these "prove it" tantrums.

The struggle is real.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
72. There is more to electoral integrity
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 02:47 PM
Mar 2017

than the vote machines. That's my point. I'm in complete agreement that the election was rigged and must be nullified ASAP.

One could argue that having a secure election would prevent a total menace from becoming president, but I'm not so sure now. That's why we need a vetting process along with secure voting. If we had had a vetting process that disqualified tRump from the start, we wouldn't be in this mess.

I think we are arguing the same point from different perspectives. We both know that the election was a fraud. We are both horrified that votes were flipped. I am slightly more horrified that someone like tRump could ever become a candidate in the first place. I feel like we already have a mechanism in place, the FBI, but either it didn't do its job or its powers did not extend far enough. And this certainly gets into your side of the argument. Comey knew early enough that there was collusion, so why couldn't the FBI and DOJ step in and make sure tRump was disqualified? Because that would appear partisan? Because that would mean betraying classified intelligence? It just goes to show that our myriad rules and procedures work against us having a clean election. Let's take a look at where we are now. We already know that Russia worked to influence the vote in tRump's favor. That is a given that seven intelligence agencies have assured us of. Logically, we should be able to nullify the election. We are a democratic nation whose election was tainted by a foreign adversary, yet our hands are tied and we continue this nightmare. It blows my mind that there is no "democratic" means to end what is universally known to have been an undemocratic election.

In the end, all I am saying is that it would be much easier to disqualify a candidate than to uncover vote flipping. I'm simply saying that we should be able to nip it in the bud from the start.

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
45. Amen to that!
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 11:42 PM
Mar 2017

The states need to start developing a system for voting that has a paper trail so that every vote can be verified.

Foresight would dictate that they begin immediately.

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
47. ballots must be hand-counted the FIRST TIME, because 99% of the time,
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 04:45 AM
Mar 2017

paper "receipts" or some such thing, will never see the light of day, if they are first fraudulently counted by a hacked machine. it's a catch-22, because you can't prove the need for a hand-recount without first doing the hand recount and comparing it to the machine results. and if the fraudulent results favor repugs, and they control the local government, you will never get a meaningful recount. that is why the ballots must be counted by hand the FIRST TIME.

 

HoneyBadger

(2,297 posts)
54. When you say hand counted, what do you mean?
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:35 AM
Mar 2017

No machine at all? Holding each ballot individually up to a light, turning it over, handing it to 3 other people to verify and loudly saying we have 1 vote for this, 1 vote for that, so forth for the 20 positions being voted on, then having each person verify the ballot against what was marked down? Or do you envision something else? Because that is how I count money when I really need to get an accurate count and make sure that it is real, though I do not have other people to verify it, I just OCD it several times.

samnsara

(17,616 posts)
51. i agree!
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:02 AM
Mar 2017

..how can 100% of the polls be 100% wrong 100% of the time??? statistically it doesn't happen naturally. the votes were flipped....100%!!!

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
61. From somebody who DOES this shit (holy fuck! am I tired of goal post movers)
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:19 AM
Mar 2017

Start quote)

Person A: I'll just say it: I believe that the "data that turned the world upside down" is altered data of tabulated votes from about 10-15 precincts in the rust belt. I think treating this or looking at this like it's a legitimate election is insane.

Person B: wait. are you saying that this election was legit stolen?

Person A: Yes. I believe that the number of people who actually voted for Trump and the number of votes that Trump received are not within a reasonable level of parity. And that Trump is brilliant at one thing: getting liberals to argue his case for him before he even needs to make it. In particular, he gets liberals to constantly argue that there cannot possibly be voter fraud or election rigging and tampering, when he is the biggest perpetrator of it.

I believe this because it is a more likely scenario than every pollster getting it wrong. It's a more likely scenario than having what, 2 million people show up at protests in the dead middle of winter? For every person who showed up at a protest, how many were at home? You and I both know the ratios on that? Getting someone to go to a protest is how many times harder than getting them to vote? 10x? 50x? The numbers don't add up. To believe otherwise is to believe that statistical modeling just straight up doesn't work, a whole bunch of people showed up to a set of protests (twice this week) that didn't actually vote, and that all of the election tampering claims from the previous administration are lies.
(end quote)

librechik

(30,674 posts)
67. I'm with you, Laydee
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 11:00 AM
Mar 2017

hang on, people are furious with me about my "fantasies" Being on the side of reality vs truthiness is not easy. Thx, thought I was all alone

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
83. Yep...pretty bothered
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 07:08 PM
Mar 2017

I just ignore the topics that are not of interest to me here on DU.

And yet, here you are...

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
84. but thanks for the kick. I appreciate. Maybe it'll save me from posting on it tomorrow
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 07:11 PM
Mar 2017

Nah....the Russian HACK into our election (and to be clear, I am not JUST talking about vote rigging, but FUUUUUCK if that's somehow "off the table&quot is by far the biggest story of our lifetime. Bar none.

We've been playing politics with the right. They've been playing war. The sooner we get hip to that, the sooner we can stop bringing knives, or strongly worded letters, to gun fights.

Tom the Mechanic

(68 posts)
69. And that can't happen until Dems vote. Voting in KS and GA NOW, where are the Dems?
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 11:14 AM
Mar 2017

All these investigations won't happen until we get a Dem majority in Congress.

We must teach Dems to vote in the Midterms.

Voting is happening now in Kansas and Georgia. Both are House seats that we need.

And yet still Dems stay home, even now.

Fix that and you can fix everything else!

Response to LaydeeBug (Original post)

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
86. I hope you realize that this talking point cedes all ground to criticize voter suppression
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 08:50 PM
Mar 2017

What it says, is your votes don't count. Without glaring evidence it is irresponsible especially when a logical conclusion is that voting is a waste of time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Future election foreca...