General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInsurance companies will fabricate "preexisting conditions" to deny payment of legitimate claims
As someone who has bought an individual health insurance policy for more than 30 years, I am warning people to look to the recent past as a predictor of how the Republican health care plan will harm, bankrupt and yes KILL Americans with the roll-back of protections for preexisting conditions.
It is much more than a factor of premiums becoming unaffordable for people with documented preexisting conditions which is alone a valid reason to oppose this bill. But it also reopens the door to the efforts of corrupt insurance companies to scour your medical records for the flimsiest rationale to declare any newly diagnosed illness or disease as a "preexisting condition." I have dealt with this personally and it was only the threat of a lawsuit that forced these crooks to pay.
While he was the Attorney General of Connecticut, Senator Richard Blumenthal went after the company that tried to deny MY claim. It was because of the work that his office did in exposing these crooks at Assurant Health that I was able to get my claim paid.
The Republican's deplorable excuse for a "health care" bill ensures a return to the good old days of making insurance unaffordable for those who need it and denying claims for people who have the temerity to actually GET ILL after faithfully paying their premiums.
"What this company did was create the illusion of coverage, when in reality, it would challenge almost any expensive procedure as a pre-existing condition," he said.
CBS' investigation of Assurant found a pattern of questionably denied claims and cancelled policies and what a South Carolina judge called a culture of "secrecy, concealment and shredded documents."
A video deposition from another court case describes what may have been cash incentives to the company's medical director to deny claims after the fact.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/when-health-coverage-doesnt-hold-up/
Raven
(13,889 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)probably salivating at the chance to return to the good old days of selling good-for-nothing policies.
I am so sorry to hear that you had a similar experience. That company is vile.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)She had ovarian cancer and BCBS iirc denied her claim because of a pre-existing condition - a yeast infection from years past.
The shit those companies pulled in the bad old days dammit
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)You get insurance - and then anything that comes up in Year One coverage is considered "pre-existing."
Talk about hedging your bets!
crazylikafox
(2,754 posts)I had forgotten how awful insurance companies were about dealing with pre-existing conditions. Denying claims of those already insured was probably even more damaging than their outright denial of coverage for those initially seeking insurance.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)I would bet that nearly all Republican-controlled states will ask for (and receive) waivers, so, basically, if you're unlucky enough to live in a Red State, you can kiss your pre-existing coverage protections good-bye.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)policies across state lines. So if you buy a policy from a company incorporated in a red state, do you have coverage for preexisting conditions or not?
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)Great question
Lars39
(26,109 posts)I was asking if a particular facility was covered. Farther into the conversation she asked if she could have my records dating from an operation 14 years ago.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)could be "proof" of a "preexisting condition."
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Use a site like Startpage that is between you and Google to make you anonymous. https://www.startpage.com/
rzemanfl
(29,556 posts)based on a pre-existing condition. Some things never change....