General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo Colbert is under scrutiny. Rachel is next, no doubt.
Because maybe it was obscene, a la Lenny Bruce.
I do worry about Maddow, but so love her for informing me.
FCC to investigate, 'take appropriate action' on Colberts Trump rant
By Mark Hensch - 05/05/17 03:51 PM EDT
Late night talk show host Stephen Colberts controversial joke about President Trump drew the attention of the Federal Communications Commission. The agency received a number of complaints about Colberts commentary earlier in the week, according to the FCCs chief.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai promised to take the appropriate action following a comprehensive investigation of Colberts remarks.
The FCC's response will depend on whether Colberts remarks are considered obscene.
more...
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/332132-fcc-probing-colberts-trump-putin-joke
kimbutgar
(21,112 posts)But he must have really got under the orange ones skin.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)what citizens think.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)I read his show is very popular. He's doing A-OK. We just have to watch.
Squinch
(50,941 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)into the business of a private enterprise.
American Cons are full of shit.
Coventina
(27,093 posts)What the fuck?!?!?!
His words were bleeped. Everybody and their hound dog uses profanity on TV, it's just beeped out.
What makes Colbert any different?
This is a pure political fucking witch hunt.
I invite them all to kiss my sn@tch.
Initech
(100,061 posts)Their mantra is just to piss us off. If they take away my Colbert, believe me, I am prepared to roll some heads.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)GP6971
(31,134 posts)oversight over cable? I thought it was just broadcast channels.
Leith
(7,808 posts)The real question is why they let real beasts like Alex Jones, Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh, et al, completely alone for decades.
GP6971
(31,134 posts)Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Jay Leno made Monica-on-her-knees jokes every night in the 1990s. How was that not obscene but this is?
Quixote1818
(28,928 posts)But it probably does. However, the words were bleeped out for broadcast so they don't have a leg to stand on there.
It all comes down to trying to make Colbert pay the price for dissing the shitgibbon. He tried to sue Bill Maher, after all. And orange boy can't help but slam back at the smallest slight, insult, or joke at his expense. Poor tender baby.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Which doesn't work because she's not in the closet.
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)I bet they're watching, because dt loves tv.
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)gross individual!
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)the word 'cock' at least. I thought that was what the network was supposed to do to stay in compliance.
Even if they were to issue a fine, wouldn't it be to CBS, rather than Colbert? A comedian can spend an hour reflecting upon amorous relations between Trump and a Russian wolfhound but he himself cannot send it out on the public airwaves. And since the show tapes at 5PM, CBS obviously could have edited it out if they gave a rat's patootie about a conservatives backlash.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)I think the free market has spoken.
katmondoo
(6,454 posts)I say it on Facebook, I say it to the wall, I say to the TV
Doreen
(11,686 posts)for their safety. I worry about them.
Lisa0825
(14,487 posts)I mean, how many shows have been bleeped over the years??? Isn't it only actionable if it was actually broadcast?
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)and others who get under his skin.
He'll use any means at his disposal to try to suppress the free speech of people in the media who criticize him. What happens will be a test of the strength of our institutions.
He may not get anywhere this time, but I expect that he and the rest of the Rs will keep trying to nibble away at our 1st Ammendent protections. I'm not too optimistic in the long term.
VOX
(22,976 posts)I fucking HATE what this country has become-- everything it fought in WWII to defeat, the U.S. now embraces.
Response to VOX (Reply #25)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Leith
(7,808 posts)Freedom of speech does not include shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater, but it does protect a comedian's jokes.
In case you didn't know, the First Amendment says that government cannot control freedom of speech. TV broadcasters, Facebook, and message boards are not controlled or owned by the government - at least not yet. Therefore it is entirely illegal for the government to control what may or may not be said in those media. Social media outlets are privately owned, which means that they have every right to disallow certain types of speech, just as you have the right to restrict what a person in your living room can say to your child.
You say that somebody attacked the president? Did those puffs of air leave bruises or draw actual blood? Did the words incite anyone to attempt physical harm on tRump? Oops! Am I allowed to use the term "tRump" or is that attacking the president?
The First Amendment certainly IS appropriate in the digital age. I have more concerns about the Second Amendment, written in the age of muskets, applying to our time when people of questionable sanity are allowed to own semiautomatics and hand grenades, but I've never made a move in any way to remove anyone's weapons from their possession.
Edited to add: well, that was some wasted typing. Maybe. Nice to know that I wasn't the only one to go "hhmmm."
TeamPooka
(24,220 posts)brooklynite
(94,493 posts)FCC only has oversight of broadcast channels