General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJimmy Carter on Bernie: 'Y'all see why I voted for him?'
Count Jimmy Carter among the Democrats with a political crush on Bernie Sanders. So much so that the former president suggests he voted for Sanders over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential primary.
Carter and Sanders appeared together Monday at The Carter Center in Atlanta.
At one point, the Vermont senator launched into a version of his populist campaign pitch.
When Sanders finished railing against a growing American oligarchy, Carter smiled and said, "Y'all see why I voted for him?" ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/jimmy-carter-bernie-yall-voted-47287918
DURHAM D
(32,606 posts)hhhmmmmmmm
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)So much for that awesome outreach effort.
Funny how people demand a woman take responsibility for losing (being cheated out of) the Presidency, while the guy who lost to her is being looked at as some divine leader. But she is supposed to shut up and disappear.
But hey, sexism has never been the problem and certainly not from those who shun identity politics.
So over that dude and his fan club.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)She's not. He's not some devine leader, but he does have a relevant voice when he can sponsor and vote on federal legislation.
karynnj
(59,498 posts)Consider that Kerry was blamed in 2004, where Edwards was considered to be one of the contenders for 2008. Gore, not Bradley, was blamed in 2000 -- even though he actually won - just think of all the he should have used Bill Clinton more CW. Dukakis was completely trashed - even though he lost to an extremely nasty Republican campaign.
The fact is that the American media always has the tendency to rewrite campaigns through the lens of who won. If you win, they emphasize things that led to greater support. If you lose, the focus is on any misstep. In Clinton's case, this is aggravated by who Trump is - making the focus totally on where she failed. Compare to 2008, where McCain, who had some really weak moments, was seen as losing to a very very charismatic wunderkind.
Ask yourself who would have been blamed had Bernie managed to defy the odds to win the nomination and then lost to Trump. We would now be seeing thousands of posts arguing that the non Democrat Bernie should never have been allowed to run in the primaries and that he hijacked the party and crashed it. Many would be moaning that had we only stuck with a candidate with the golden resume and years of high level experience we would not have Trump.
In fact, just as a MA poster in DU JK, Tay Tay, pointed out to our group, Kerry was actually treated much better than Dukakis, I think that Hillary is being treated better by elements of the Democratic party than Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, McGovern and Carter were treated. While there are few who see her as THE leader of the Democratic party, almost all see her as A leader, with an important message and constituency. This may not seem much, but in 2005 and 2006, there were efforts to deny Kerry the status of one of the Democratic leaders. However, any losing nominee will suddenly lose the status in their party of being "the next president" For Clinton, it is aggravated by the fact that from at least 2000 she was seen as the likely first woman President.
Part of what we may be seeing now is a fight for the future of the party, where Clinton and Bernie might almost be seen as proxies. On both sides, many would like to eliminate Clinton or Bernie as an important voice of the party. I seriously doubt either will run - and if they did, my prediction would be that neither would be as successful as they were in 2016. However, they do represent different wings of the party that will likely both want to have a nominee from their side.
I suspect that now that he is back from his break, Obama will be seen as the head of the party and its strongest voice until the 2020 primaries start. I also think that both Sanders and both Clintons will speak out on issues that matter to them. As Clinton said a million times, we are stronger together.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Of course, it won't please the diehard refight-the-primary crowd on either side.
George II
(67,782 posts)Javaman
(62,503 posts)malaise
(268,702 posts)No surprise
demmiblue
(36,823 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I guess Jimmy Carter is on the naughty list, now. Along with Elizabeth Warren.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No more and no less than Carter and Warren are now baptized by a sacred cow.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other... each as petulant and without merit as the other.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)See, this is why religion is tough to take seriously.
ZM90
(706 posts)I would have said that regardless of who he voted for by the way. He really has had a amazing post presidency. The fact that he voted for Bernie is just icing on the cake.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Integrity.
ZM90
(706 posts)Honesty.
He was honest with the American people about the difficult choices we had to make regarding our climate and he was mocked for it. A lot of people say that Jimmy was too honest for the office.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)a candidate that could make a real difference in Congress, I admire President Carter for his good works after he was president.. but we had 12 years of GOP rule after he left office...not good times in my opinion.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I think that's true. His moral compass has always been intact.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)another seat...as the healthcare vote demonstrated, this is very important.
Nanjeanne
(4,915 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)From an August 2016 news report:
" But) everybody knows that I'm a Democrat, and I'll be voting Democratic," he clarified.
still_one
(92,061 posts)preferences.
What will be interesting though, call me cynical, is to see if the media tries to plays things like this up in the next few days, or instead focus on how millions could lose their healthcare, the destruction of EPA, the widespread ramifications of yesterday's testimony by Sally Yates and Clapper, or a 100 other issues that will directly have a negative impact on the well being of people.
LexVegas
(6,031 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)LexVegas
(6,031 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)I can feel the unity.
sammythecat
(3,568 posts)This kind of shit is driving me away from this place. I really don't get this relentless, fanatical, and downright stupid hatred of anything at all Bernie Sanders. It got tiresome many months ago. I recently got my first ever hide for responding to one that didn't even read the post, just saw "Bernie" in the headline and immediately posted a completely irrelevant disparaging accusation. I wish the admins would make an effort to at least tone down this never ending vendetta.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)I also feel driven away at times.
But I'm against the Republicans. And so are these Democrats.
I consider myself a democrat even if they don't want me.
I'm not here for acceptance or comraderie anymore. I'm here for those who need it. Others can choose to butt heads with me if they want when we share the same goals but that's what the ignore list is for.
If I probably wouldnt get along with you in real life then why should I suffer fool's digitally? Know what I mean?
I don't have to be friends to be an ally.
LostOne4Ever
(9,286 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)exactly.
LostOne4Ever
(9,286 posts)KTM
(1,823 posts)Its just not true, as has been reported:
Among registered voters, fifty-eight percent of women view Sanders favorably, as do 55 percent of men. He is most popular among people aged 18 to 34, who give him a 62 percent approval rating. Sanders also has majority support among those over the age of 50.
While Sanders struggled during his Democratic primary challenge against Clinton in states with large African-American voting populations, he is viewed favorably by 73 percent of black registered voters.
Thats better than Hispanics, at 68 percent favorable, Asian-Americans, at 62 percent favorable, and whites, at 52 percent favorable.
Sanders is viewed favorably by 80 percent of registered Democrats, even though he has steadfastly refused to join the party whose presidential nominee he campaigned for.
nikibatts
(2,198 posts)Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)Honestly.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)as Bernie would be bad for him? I think that Bernie is just the wrong person for the job they gave him. Seems his pattern is not being there for anyone he perceives as not backing him in the primaries. That's just fucked up. How do you give someone who has been the biggest divisive factor in our party in years the position of outreach leader?
I used to love Bernie, but now I'm still steaming over this pillorying of Hillary while watching this self absorbed dude get propped up on a pedestal and treated like he gives two fucks about the Democratic Party that he won't join. It's as insane as everything else going on in this country right now.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)to join the party while holding himself special and above it all.
delisen
(6,042 posts)I think the argument of some is that independents are a growing segment of the electorate and the best we can aim for is to convince them that they are better off not joining the party and just pick up some sticks and poke at the Democratic Party pinada and try to make it a lesser "lesser evil," or just shout at it to get it to do what you want.
I don't know there something weird about it to me. It like having a cheerleading squad that rushes out at halftime when their team is trailing, with big megaphones and shouts to the team what a lousy job their doing and how they better shape up or else.
It seems to me that method of operation would just encourage and embolden the opposing team and discourage the team you are trying to help win.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Ossoff has chosen to run as a fiscal conservative. Handel has plenty of money for attack ads, and I'm sure she and her handlers would love to paint Ossoff as a Bernie clone.
There is, at an absolute minimum, a strong case to be made that Bernie helps Ossoff by staying away.
QC
(26,371 posts)into Newt Gingrich's old district might not be a good idea?
JI7
(89,240 posts)isn't running for anything.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)trying to connect him to Pelosi and Sanders and Warren... because they think it will hurt him.
Unless you have different info, I am going to assume that Ossof hasn't invited Bernie to help and perhaps even asked him to keep at arms length. That is a fragile district and I am sure they are doing what they think they need to do to win.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)go to the 6th district? No I don't see a problem. Do you? If so, what?
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)This is not normal.
demmiblue
(36,823 posts)Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Zealous and extreme Bernie hatred displayed daily here.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He has done great work and continues to do so. It's really too bad that things are so polarized that the headline is what it has to be. In thread after thread I keep hearing how Carter is now under the bus. Seems pretty foolish to me. Each response should simply be how little difference there is in that and holding people up as deities. We are losing so much of our message because of this.
Keep preaching on Carter.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Response to pnwmom (Reply #34)
moondust This message was self-deleted by its author.