Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFive Reasons the Comey Affair Is Worse Than Watergate
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/comey-watergate/526443/Five Reasons the Comey Affair Is Worse Than Watergate
A journalist who covered Nixons fall 45 years ago explains why the current challenge to America may be more severeand the democratic system less capable of handling it.
Senate Watergate Committee members and staff gather around Chairman Sam Ervin Bettman / Getty
James Fallows
May 12, 2017 Politics
The tangled affair now known as Watergate began 45 years ago, before most of todays U.S. population had even been born. (The median age of Americans is about 38, so most people in the country were born in 1979 or thereafter.) Thus for most people Watergate is a historical allusionobviously negative in its implications, since it led to the only presidential resignation in American history, but probably hazy in its details.
For me, Watergate is anything but hazy. Id left graduate school and begun my first magazine job, with The Washington Monthly, in the fall of 1972, as news of the scandal emerged. Over the next two years, until Richard Nixons resignation, I was living in D.C. and tracking the daily progress in clue-following and domino-toppling via stories in The Washington Post and elsewhereand then the riveting, televised Watergate hearings that made national celebrities of politicians like Senators Howard Baker and Sam Ervin, and of White House aides like Alexander Butterfield (who revealed the existence of Nixons secret system for taping White House conversations) and John Dean (who as White House counsel had told Nixon, there is a cancer on the presidency). Anyone of conscious age in that time can probably remember the jolts to national sentiment that the near-daily revelations evoked.
So Ive been thinking about comparisons between Watergate and the murky, fast-changing Comey-Russia-Flynn-Trump affair. As with anything involving Donald Trump, we have no idea where this will lead, what is true, and when the next bombshell will go off.
But based simply on what is known so far, this scandal looks worse than Watergate. Worse for and about the president. Worse for the overall national interest. Worse in what it suggests about the American democratic systems ability to defend itself. Here is a summary of some reasons why:
* * *
The underlying offense
At some point in the coverage of every scandal youll hear the chestnut Its always the cover-up, never the crime. This refers of course to the historical reality that scandal-bound figures make more problems by denying or lying about their misdeeds than they would if they had come clean from the start.
This saying first became really popular in the Watergate erawhich is significant for what it suggests about the gravity of the underlying crime in that case. Richard Nixons beleaguered press secretary Ron Ziegler, a Sean Spicerlike figure of that era, oversold the point when he dismissed the break-in at Democratic National Committee headquarters as a third-rate burglary. But the worst version of what Nixon and his allies were attempting to donamely, to find incriminating or embarrassing information about political adversaries ranging from Democratic Party Chairman Lawrence OBrien to Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsbergwas not as bad as what came afterward. Those later efforts included attempts to derail investigations by the FBI, the police, and various grand juries and congressional committees, which collectively amounted to obstruction of justice.
And what is alleged this time? Nothing less than attacks by an authoritarian foreign government on the fundamentals of American democracy, by interfering with an electionand doing so as part of a larger strategy that included parallel interference in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and elsewhere. At worst, such efforts might actually have changed the election results. At least, they were meant to destroy trust in democracy. Not much of this is fully understood or proven, but the potential stakes are incomparably greater than what happened during Watergate, crime and cover-up alike.
more...
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/comey-watergate/526443/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 530 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post