General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis has been bugging me
Why do the news reports and government officials all refer to "tapes" when discussing whether Trump has a recording system in the White House? Do they really mean reel-to-reel or cassette tapes? Today, nearly all recordings are made using digital technologies. They aren't "tapes," they're recordings.
Or has "tape" lost its actual meaning and now means anything recorded? After all, I still hear people refer to video recordings as "videotapes."
Sorry for the mini-rant about words.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Jim Dandy
(358 posts)PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Sorry. (wink)
underpants
(182,769 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Even though no one has used actual tapes for years. It comes with being older than a certain age.
ginnyinWI
(17,276 posts)Like we say "dial" a phone number, and rotary phones are long gone.
Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)...literally, anymore. "Albums" once referred to an actual album of around six 78 RPM records. Kleenex means any nose tissue.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)yourself and your heart any favors by getting bogged down in technicalities. Trump will drive us all to the E.R. or the cliff's edge with the big stuff, that we won't have time allowing ourselves to dwell on the small stuff; tapes vs. recordings. In a way, I wish that was the worse thing I had to contemplate from this administration, on a day to day basis.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)When Sarah Palin began her word salads, I thought Republicans had reached the bottom of the barrel. Oops. Thankfully, she never got her mitts on the levers of power. Now, however...
Vinca
(50,261 posts)And he probably listens to them on his 8-track cassette player.