Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(13,781 posts)
Tue May 16, 2017, 06:12 PM May 2017

Can a lawyer on DU tell us what has to happen...

... for a President to be indicted for obstruction of justice? Legally? I know congress can impeach a president for things that are not technically illegal (and the time has long passed when they should), but what technical, legal thing prevents a president from shutting down investigations, since he is the top dog in the executive branch?

TIA
LAS

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can a lawyer on DU tell us what has to happen... (Original Post) LAS14 May 2017 OP
I dont think you can obstruct justice when dealing with the investigative body? Eliot Rosewater May 2017 #1
Nothing prevents a Pres. from TRYING to shut down an investigation dixiegrrrrl May 2017 #2
I think he has to be impeached AND voted out before he can be prosecuted. hlthe2b May 2017 #3
What are the grounds for your opinion? LAS14 May 2017 #4
Listening to various attorneys on TRMS (esp. Matt Miller, former Obama DOJ), Jake Tapper & Cuomo on hlthe2b May 2017 #6
Here is what is likely to be the definitive opinion from Georgetown Law (Susan Bloch) hlthe2b May 2017 #7
Thanks very much. nt LAS14 May 2017 #11
That's my understanding, too. As executive head he can't be prosecuted while in office Warren DeMontague May 2017 #9
Am not a lawyer, but I understand the constitution is supreme, not the executive branch. Madam45for2923 May 2017 #5
The longstanding position of the Justice Department is that a sitting president is not amenable tritsofme May 2017 #8
Not a lawyer but the only recourse is impeachment. Statistical May 2017 #10
Thanks to all. Really good answers to my question. nt LAS14 May 2017 #12
The indictment is presented to Congress and the SAA arrests the President on orders from Senate. L. Coyote May 2017 #13
Message deleted by DU the Administrators LAS14 May 2017 #14
Sargeant At Arms. The wingnuts wrote some stuff about this during Obama's terms: L. Coyote May 2017 #15
Message deleted by DU the Administrators LAS14 May 2017 #16
This site lays it out pretty thoroughly Egnever May 2017 #17
Sitting presidents cannot be indicted Spider Jerusalem May 2017 #18

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
1. I dont think you can obstruct justice when dealing with the investigative body?
Tue May 16, 2017, 06:16 PM
May 2017

Not sure, but that is what I heard on Rachel or Lawrence by an attorney.

FBI is the investigative branch.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
2. Nothing prevents a Pres. from TRYING to shut down an investigation
Tue May 16, 2017, 06:32 PM
May 2017

but when they have tried, others have raised hell, publicly.
Nixon was given a choice, resign or be impeached, and it was when HE knew, and Congress knew, there were enough votes to impeach. So he chose resignation.
that worked with Nixon, a man who had a firm grasp on the importance of history and a choice what history would say about him.
Even then, it still took almost 2 years to reach that point because the media was unwilling to go after him at first.


Normally, the Dept. of Justice prepares the indictment.

Trump is also being investigated in New York, the Attorney General of the state there has power to indict, and Trump has no power to stop it.

The legal branch and Congress have the power to over-ride a President, when needed.

hlthe2b

(102,205 posts)
6. Listening to various attorneys on TRMS (esp. Matt Miller, former Obama DOJ), Jake Tapper & Cuomo on
Tue May 16, 2017, 09:54 PM
May 2017

CNN: John Dean, and Lawrence Tribe and (Seth Abramson

While I can't verbatim quote any of them, I've yet to hear any of them say anything to contradict this conclusion.

Though this was what I gleaned from their comments, I think they would all emphasize that we are in (largely) unchartered waters


ALSO See my post#7 below for a more definitive answer.

hlthe2b

(102,205 posts)
7. Here is what is likely to be the definitive opinion from Georgetown Law (Susan Bloch)
Tue May 16, 2017, 09:59 PM
May 2017

[PDF]Can We Indict a Sitting President? - Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN ...
scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2573&context=facpub
by SL Bloch - ‎1997

http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2573&context=facpub
President is unique and cannot be subject to prosecution by state or federal systems while in office. He must first be removed either by impeachment, the voters ...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
9. That's my understanding, too. As executive head he can't be prosecuted while in office
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:06 PM
May 2017

The only remedy is political, i.e. impeachment.

 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
5. Am not a lawyer, but I understand the constitution is supreme, not the executive branch.
Tue May 16, 2017, 08:15 PM
May 2017

So Trump is trumped by the constitution.

tritsofme

(17,374 posts)
8. The longstanding position of the Justice Department is that a sitting president is not amenable
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:05 PM
May 2017

to federal indictment. A president must leave office before he can be prosecuted.

link

Statistical

(19,264 posts)
10. Not a lawyer but the only recourse is impeachment.
Tue May 16, 2017, 10:18 PM
May 2017

Understand that this has simply never been tried in the courts. No prosecutor has ever even attempted to bring charges against a sitting President in the history of the nation so you won't find any evidence to confirm or deny this because well it has never happened. The Constitution also provide no specific language prohibiting or endorsing an indictment. However most legal experts agree that the Constitution prohibits such an action. The recourse under the law is to impeach the President nothing else. It is the check and balance as envisioned by the founding fathers. Either a crime is serious enough for impeachment OR it can be resolved after the President leaves office at the end of his or her term.

So
a) The Congress impeaches the President and he is convicted
b) He is charged after he leaves office in ~4 years

On edit:
The Attorney General’s Office of Legal Counsel has only looked at this issue formally twice, one regarding Nixon and once regarding Clinton and in both cases reached a decision that the Constitution prohibits any indictment against a President during their term.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
13. The indictment is presented to Congress and the SAA arrests the President on orders from Senate.
Wed May 17, 2017, 10:16 AM
May 2017

Watch LIVE on Thursday.

Then, the House takes up impeachment and the Senate convicts. After that, the Supremacy Clause no longer applies and the criminal trial proceeds.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
15. Sargeant At Arms. The wingnuts wrote some stuff about this during Obama's terms:
Wed May 17, 2017, 11:17 AM
May 2017
Can a Sitting President be Arrested? (I won't link these asshats.)

..... we have found one and only one person that has been specifically given the power within our government to arrest the president. The Senate Sergeant at Arms has the power to arrest anyone that violates Senate rules. The proof is in the following government website where it states: “The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States. http://www.senate.gov/reference/office/sergeant_at_arms.htm
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
17. This site lays it out pretty thoroughly
Wed May 17, 2017, 12:57 PM
May 2017
https://www.lawfareblog.com/another-bomb-drops-initial-thoughts-trump-asking-comey-kill-flynn-investigation

They also have some really interesting podcasts with former department officials discussing the ramifications from a legal perspective.
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
18. Sitting presidents cannot be indicted
Wed May 17, 2017, 01:01 PM
May 2017

what has to happen is for the Justice Department (or a special prosecutor) in the course of investigating to find clear evidence of obstruction of justice, and to forward that evidence to the House of Representatives, which will draw up a bill of impeachment. ("Obstruction of justice" was one of the items on the bill of impeachment against Nixon.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can a lawyer on DU tell u...