Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Leghorn21

(13,522 posts) Tue May 16, 2017, 06:38 PM May 2017

from that Oval Office, ffs - why wouldn't the Director of the FBI have convos recorded??

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why wouldn't COMEY have tapes/recordings whatever? Ain't nothing gonna come (Original Post) Leghorn21 May 2017 OP

Because it's illegal to tape someone secretly without a subpoena? angstlessk May 2017 #1

(11,862 posts)

1. Because it's illegal to tape someone secretly without a subpoena?

Tue May 16, 2017, 06:41 PM

May 2017

And notes taken at the time can be as good evidence as tapes.

(13,522 posts)

2. I thank you kindly for your reply, angst!! I have heard there are different laws that apply

Tue May 16, 2017, 06:44 PM

May 2017

to recording, depending on the state...again, I thank you -

Glad to hear "notes" are bona fide evidence, though!!