General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInside Putin's Campaign To Destroy U.S. Democracy
BY BILL POWELL ON 5/18/17 AT 6:00 AM
It was a few days after the start of the new millennium, and the U.S. Embassy in Moscow was holding a reception at Spaso House, for decades the elegant residence of the American ambassador. Russias tumultuous Boris Yeltsin era had come to an abrupt, shocking end on New Years Day, when the Russian president who had brought down the Soviet Union and turned his country into a chaotic, fledgling democracy announced his resignation. His successor was the man he had named his prime minister just four months earlier, a man barely known to most Russians, let alone to the outside world: former KGB officer Vladimir Putin.
As Jim Collins, a soft-spoken career diplomat who was then the U.S. ambassador to Russia, made the rounds at that reception, querying guests as to what they thought of the dramatic shift atop the Kremlin, the overwhelming sentiment was relief. The Yeltsin era, which had begun with so much promise, had turned into a shambolic, deeply corrupt dystopia. Yeltsin, who had burst to prominence with a burly energyhis climb atop a tank in central Moscow to turn back revanchists who sought to save the Soviet dictatorship is one of the iconic moments of the Cold Wars endhad become chronically ill and increasingly fond of his vodka. A group of politically connected businessmen had raped the country economically and spirited most of their gains offshore. Its budget was busted, its civil servants unpaid. (I did a story then about a colonel in the Soviet Rocket Forces who killed himself because he could not afford to throw his wife a birthday party.) The once mightyand mightily effectiveKGB had to watch its best officers go off to work for private businessmen, leaving the state security services demoralized and increasingly corrupt. Russia was in chaos.
Collins listened to the various opinions offered and then offered his own. They need someone, he said, who can get control of this place. In other words, he too was relieved that Yeltsin was gone.
We forget now, in the midst of the intensifying hysteria in Washington, D.C., about all things Russia, that Vladimir Vladimirovich Putinnow commonly portrayed as a cartoon villain by Western politicians and presshad a honeymoon period. Many people back then chose to disregard Putins career in the KGB and focused instead on the fact that he had been an energetic aide to the reform-minded mayor of his native St. Petersburg in the immediate post-Soviet era. Madeleine Albright, then Bill Clintons secretary of state, called him a reformer, and both sides of the political aisle in Washington were conned by Putin in the following decade. George W. Bush, desperately seeking Russian help in the post-9/11 war on terror, famously said he had looked into [Putins] soul. ("So have I, cracked Senator John McCain, "and I saw three letters: KGB.) As recently as the 2012 election, President Barack Obama mocked Mitt Romney for calling Putin a threat to the United States. "The 1980s called, and they want their foreign policy back, Obama cracked.
more
http://www.newsweek.com/2017/05/26/inside-putin-campaign-destroy-us-democracy-610401.html
DK504
(3,847 posts)I laughed at him too, guess I shouldn't just taken him as a buffoon at face value. Although I am sure President Obama listened and had his Cabinet look into it, maybe we did under estimate the Commie Control freak.
dalton99a
(81,442 posts)FigTree
(347 posts)Everything Russia does is based on national pride. The point Putin is also trying to make across the World is that authoritarian methods, like its own, are necessary to govern and that pretending otherwise is disingenuous. This message, I believe, is primarily aimed at its own people.
Putin's narrative goes something like: "look at them, the so-called "good guys", the champions of democracy, look at who they really are." And indeed...
For instance, the French government had to resort to censorship to prevent Russia's attempt at influencing its election.
The deep issue here is therefore about the power of the people. The form this power has to take at this point in history is, or should be the real issue.
This looks to me like a worldwide institutional crisis rather than a pedestrian East/West movie plot.