Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
Thu May 18, 2017, 11:48 AM May 2017

I now think we need to slow down on impeachment/removal (and why we should always listen to Pelosi).

Trump is now poison. If he really made the statement included in Comey's memo, and I'm sure he did, it's a slam dunk case for obstruction of justice.

What that means is everything he touches is now tainted. That includes health care, and probably even tax "reform." The former is almost certainly dead, and the latter just got much harder.

We also need to let the investigation play out. Doing so means that the Trump stain continues to create headwinds for any terrible piece of legislation. It also affords investigators time to collect evidence against other figures - i.e., Pence, Sessions, and maybe even Ryan.

Slowing down also guarantees that the issue has an effect on the midterms. I can't imagine it wouldn't anyway, regardless of the timing, but never underestimate the limited attention span of the American public.

I want Trump gone as much as anyone, but doing it this way is better for Democrats and healthier for the country (because it ensures that we root out all the perpetrators). This is why Nancy Pelosi said that we're not at impeachment YET (notwithstanding how her statement was communicated by others).

And I can't believe I'm saying this out loud, but I'm starting to think that a President Pelosi isn't out of the realm of possibility. It's obviously still a long-shot, but the fact that there's now a path to it happening is nothing short of remarkable.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I now think we need to slow down on impeachment/removal (and why we should always listen to Pelosi). (Original Post) Bleacher Creature May 2017 OP
Yes, because getting reelected is the most important thing leftstreet May 2017 #1
Exactly! CountAllVotes May 2017 #4
I'd go with neutering harmful Republican legislation, but to each his own. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #5
Or, campaign on popular legislation and win that way! leftstreet May 2017 #20
+1. nt tblue37 May 2017 #2
Can't Trump fire them mteach May 2017 #3
Not going to happen. A fantasy. Welcome to DU. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2017 #6
there is no path at all for pelosi becoming president, except if she runs in 2020. unblock May 2017 #7
It's clearly the longest of longshots. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #13
removal requires 2/3rd of the senate. unblock May 2017 #14
Believe me, I'm certainly not going to wager any money on that scenario. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #18
Well there is a legislative upside to his incompetence, unblock May 2017 #19
I was just saying this last night Kber May 2017 #8
see post #7. republicans won't remove donnie and pence at the same time. unblock May 2017 #10
I totally agree and recommend. nt LAS14 May 2017 #9
Agreed Buckeyeblue May 2017 #11
"Revenge is a dish best served cold." DemocratSinceBirth May 2017 #12
And then pass single-payer and universal pre-K, expand social security, etc. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #15
completely ignores the ACTUAL CRISIS we are facing MedusaX May 2017 #16
I actually agree with you 100%. Bleacher Creature May 2017 #21
I've long thought that we don't want resolution too quickly... Wounded Bear May 2017 #17

mteach

(1 post)
3. Can't Trump fire them
Thu May 18, 2017, 11:52 AM
May 2017

Can't Trump ask Rosenstein to fire Mueller? And if he doesn't fire Rosenstein..just like Nixon? I don't see him having any restraint to hold back. What happens then?

unblock

(52,116 posts)
7. there is no path at all for pelosi becoming president, except if she runs in 2020.
Thu May 18, 2017, 11:56 AM
May 2017

perhaps you're banking on her becoming the speaker of the house after 2018, then getting rid of both benedict donald and pence?

republicans will never allow that to happen simulaneously.

even if both go, they will remove one, appoint a new republican veep, then remove the other.

that way they keep the white house in republican hands.


ok, ok, there's a tiny window in which they remove one, then the other immediately drops dead before they can confirm a new veep. so maybe there's a one-hour window. of course, they'd lie about the time of death, so it would have to be something like a public decapitation so they couldn't get away with that. very remote chance....

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
13. It's clearly the longest of longshots.
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:04 PM
May 2017

But if Republicans refuse to deal with Trump before November 2018 and it costs them the House, it's not up to them anymore.

And don't forget, the Senate has to confirm a replacement VP, so they won't be able to swap Pence out with someone "cleaner."

unblock

(52,116 posts)
14. removal requires 2/3rd of the senate.
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:07 PM
May 2017

even if we win the house and move forward with dual impeachment, republicans can block removal or at least control the timing to allow a replacement -- that's even if we also win a senate majority, which is a real longshot itself.

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
18. Believe me, I'm certainly not going to wager any money on that scenario.
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:18 PM
May 2017

And, yes, there's probably a better chance of me winning the lottery. But a lot of things have transpired these last few months that nothing is impossible.

I probably shouldn't have raised the Pelosi scenario in my OP, because my point remains the same, which is that Trump's presence makes it a lot easier to stop harmful legislation. And letting the investigation continue increases the chance that we'll get rid of a few others as well, regardless of how it plays out in the line of succession.

Kber

(5,043 posts)
8. I was just saying this last night
Thu May 18, 2017, 11:56 AM
May 2017

It's the GOP who should want to rush. That way, even if Pence and Ryan are implicated, you get President Hatch. Let this play out more slowly, and yep, President Pelosi becomes a possibility.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
11. Agreed
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:01 PM
May 2017

I don't want this thing to move so fast that it blows over with minimal damage to the Rs. I want to implicate as many of them as possible. I want big gains in 2018. And i want congress to keep those big gains in 2020 so we can undo the harm that has been done and move forward with a smart aggressive agenda.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
12. "Revenge is a dish best served cold."
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:02 PM
May 2017

Use the issue to recapture the House in 018 and stymie GOP legislation, then impeach him and slow walk the process so the trial in the Senate is going on during the 2020 election. We then win the presidency, House, and Senate.

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
15. And then pass single-payer and universal pre-K, expand social security, etc.
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:07 PM
May 2017

It would be quite the silver lining.

MedusaX

(1,129 posts)
16. completely ignores the ACTUAL CRISIS we are facing
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:14 PM
May 2017

If 45 were simply Warren G Harding or
Bozo the Clown...
then sure let him publicly fuck up for 4 years and we will consider it free entertainment.

But this is an entirely different ballgame.

There will not be a recognizable democracy by this time next year, much less Nov 2018 or 2020 ...

Once those sanctions automatically expire in March /April 2018 this little coup will be so sufficiently entrenched & well funded that 45 will lock down & become the authoritarian of his fantasies.....

Policy & politics & party all need to respectfully step aside until Liberty & Justice are no longer held hostage and the Constitution is reinstated as the guiding principle of the nation.

Bleacher Creature

(11,252 posts)
21. I actually agree with you 100%.
Thu May 18, 2017, 03:58 PM
May 2017

Trump does pose a very clear and present danger to everyone based on his demeanor, lack of judgment and overall mental state. If that can't be contained, my entire suggestion doesn't work.

I'm just hopeful that he's been exposed so much these last few weeks, that even his own staff is taking measures to minimize what he can do. We've had Presidents who have essentially been incapacitated before, Reagan most recently. I'm not saying that horrible people won't still be making the decisions, only an election can fix that. But if he needs to be confined to is own personal romper room, his ability to do something reckless is minimized.

Wounded Bear

(58,598 posts)
17. I've long thought that we don't want resolution too quickly...
Thu May 18, 2017, 12:16 PM
May 2017

If this played out in the next few weeks, it would fade as a 2018 issue.

This is right up there with AHCA and tax cuts for rich bastards as 2018 campaign fodder.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I now think we need to sl...