Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,393 posts)
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:16 PM May 2017

Any chance some of these leaks are disinformation?

Not one to be paranoid, but sometimes I think it's a bit too convenient that we have these daily stories about tRumpco, their traitorous acts, mendacity, etc. It's almost too good to be true.

Which makes me wonder if a % of these stories have been planted as disinformation in an effort to cast doubt on the stories that are 100% true. It wouldn't be unusual to have tRump loyalists acting as "sources" for media types, when they are in fact planting lies today, with the plan of later revealing that they were a source of "fake news." The claim could be made that it was an exercise to prove how gullible the MSM is when it comes to reporting fake news. It's a Gish Gallop - discredit one story to cast doubt on the rest.

Which is why I hope these media types all have double, triple and more sources behind the stories that are now emerging.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
1. I think the main stream media has the names of the unidentified sources
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:22 PM
May 2017

and if they try to pretend they are fake...they will hand out their names in a heartbeat!

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
2. I think angstlessk is full of wisdom.
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:24 PM
May 2017

Beside those clowns aren't smart enough to pull something like that off.

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
3. NY Times and Wash. Post are extremely cautious, sat on backchannel story for months
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:25 PM
May 2017

Several media outlets had the Steele Dossier for months and never reported a peep about it until Buzzfeed leaked it. Wash Post had an anonymous backchannel allegation for months before getting several more sources just recently providing confirmation. I am not too concerned about disinformation since these outlets are extremely cautious, and were actually too cautious during election and failed to reveal enough about Trump/Russia connections.

Even after NY Times and Wash. Post and Reuters etc. break stories, NBC, CBS , ABC, etc have been independently confirming with their own sources before definitely reporting.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
5. NYT published the Jared just wanted to talk about Syria bullshit knowing it came from his friends...
Sun May 28, 2017, 03:32 PM
May 2017

WaPo let it be known that is exactly why it would not report that without attributing it to people close to Kushner. The NYT is still trying to curry favor with the WH for useless scoops.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
7. If Trump get's into hot water I think the murderer Putin will release proof
Sun May 28, 2017, 04:37 PM
May 2017

that will back up the dossier. Piss and all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any chance some of these ...