General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThanks to Trump, Germany says it can't rely on the United States. What does that mean?
By Henry Farrell May 28 at 2:34 PM
German Chancellor Angela Merkel told a crowd Sunday in southern Germany that Europe can no longer rely on foreign partners.
<Merkel on Sunday declared a new chapter in U.S.-European relations after contentious meetings with President Trump last week, saying that Europe really must take our fate into our own hands.
Offering a tough review in the wake of Trumps trip to visit E.U., NATO and Group of Seven leaders last week, Merkel told a packed Bavarian beer hall rally that the days when Europe could rely on others was over to a certain extent. This is what I have experienced in the last few days.>
This is an enormous change in political rhetoric. While the public is more familiar with the special relationship between Britain and the United States, the German-U.S. relationship has arguably been more important. One of the key purposes of NATO was to embed Germany in an international framework that would prevent it from becoming a threat to European peace as it had been in World War I and World War II. In the words of NATOs first secretary general, NATO was supposed to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. Now, Merkel is suggesting that the Americans arent really in, and, by extension, Germany and Europe are likely to take on a much more substantial and independent role than they have in the past 70 years.
This is thanks to Trump
Merkels comment about what she has experienced in the past few days is a clear reference to President Trumps disastrous European tour. Her belief that the United States is no longer a reliable partner is a direct result of Trumps words and actions. The keystone of NATO is Article 5, which has typically been read as a commitment that in the event that one member of the alliance is attacked, all other members will come to its aid. When Trump visited NATO, he dedicated a plaque to the one time that Article 5 has been invoked when all members of NATO promised to come to the United States support after the attack on Sept. 11, 2001. However, Trump did not express his commitment to Article 5 in his speech to NATO, instead lambasting other NATO members for not spending enough money on their militaries. When Trump went on to the Group of Seven meeting in Italy, he declined to recommit to the Paris agreement on climate change, leaving the other six nations to issue a separate statement.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/05/28/thanks-to-trump-germany-says-it-cant-rely-on-america-what-does-that-mean/?utm_term=.de8341cb4d3a&wpisrc=nl_evening&wpmm=1
Nevermypresident
(781 posts)(I stay at a low level simmer these days, except when I'm raging)
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)and all media outlets need to move this along quickly. The destruction of our country and the world by drumpf is epic.
cheyanne
(733 posts)First, Trump accepts meeting with Russians in the Oval Office, excludes US press, and leaks intelligence from a close ally, alerting all countries that intelligence sharing with the Trump administration may be compromised by Trump at any time.
Second, shared intelligence from British agencies about Manchester bombing is leaked by US to media. Again, a close ally is burned by Trump administration.
How long before our only friend is Russia?