Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,920 posts)
Sun Jul 2, 2017, 01:03 PM Jul 2017

Norm Eisen says Trump's violence-inciting tweet this morning is a crime under 18 USC 875(c)




Under 18 USC 875(c) it is a crime to "transmit any communication containing any threat to injure the person of another."


___

Editing to add Eisen's earlier responses to Trump's tweet:




Let's admit it: this bizarre, ominous threat of violence vs a media outlet from the most powerful man in the world is Hitlerian.





Threatening a beating = crime (assault). If I affixed trump's face to a man being beaten and posted it, Secret Service would pay me a visit





This tweet is evidence of mental deterioration. The President needs a psych evaluation. I mean that seriously and literally. #25thAmendment
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Norm Eisen says Trump's violence-inciting tweet this morning is a crime under 18 USC 875(c) (Original Post) highplainsdem Jul 2017 OP
Unfortunately it appears Eisen hasn't kept up with the law onenote Jul 2017 #1
The SC didn't define sufficient knowledge or intent, so I wouldn't be so hasty to nullify Eisen. FreepFryer Jul 2017 #2
A prosecution on these facts would never be brought onenote Jul 2017 #3
That's another interesting argument, to be sure. Let's see what happens. (n/t) FreepFryer Jul 2017 #4
Who's Norm Eisen? NobodyHere Jul 2017 #5

onenote

(42,609 posts)
1. Unfortunately it appears Eisen hasn't kept up with the law
Sun Jul 2, 2017, 01:24 PM
Jul 2017

In June 2015, the Supreme Court decided Elonis v. United States, holding that 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) requires that the communication at issue be transmitted for the purpose of issuing a threat, or with the knowledge that the communication will be viewed as a threat and not when the statement may objectively be a threat but not subjectively intended as such.

No chance of meeting that burden of proof in this case.

onenote

(42,609 posts)
3. A prosecution on these facts would never be brought
Sun Jul 2, 2017, 01:45 PM
Jul 2017

For one thing beating up an entity is not a particularized threat against the person of another.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Norm Eisen says Trump's v...