Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Mon Jul 3, 2017, 06:20 PM Jul 2017

This womans name appears on the Declaration of Independence. So why don't we know her story?



"This Fourth of July, look closely at one of those printed copies of the Declaration of Independence.

See it? The woman’s name at the bottom?

It’s right there. Mary Katherine Goddard.

If you’ve never noticed it or heard of her, you aren’t alone. She’s a Founding Mother, of sorts, yet few folks know about her. And some of America’s earliest bureaucrats did their best to shut her down. Same old, same old.

Goddard was fearless her entire career as one of America’s first female publishers, printing scoops from Revolutionary War battles from Concord to Bunker Hill and continuing to publish after her offices were twice raided and her life was repeatedly threatened by haters.

Yup, she faced down the Twitter trolls of 1776."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/this-womans-name-appears-on-the-declaration-of-independence-so-why-dont-we-know-her-story/2017/07/03/ce86bf2e-5ff1-11e7-84a1-a26b75ad39fe_story.html
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This womans name appears on the Declaration of Independence. So why don't we know her story? (Original Post) ehrnst Jul 2017 OP
because only white male property owners are created equal? nt msongs Jul 2017 #1
That's not the original Declaration panader0 Jul 2017 #2
That's the subject of the article. She was a publisher. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2017 #6
The title of the OP is mieleading is what I mean. panader0 Jul 2017 #9
I understand. She put her name on the published version - at great peril to herself. ehrnst Jul 2017 #11
Very interesting article. Croney Jul 2017 #3
She was the second printer, actually. Igel Jul 2017 #8
A big, fat K&R! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2017 #4
Quite right, CaliforniaPeggy! K & R! BadgerMom Jul 2017 #5
But You Know...Identity Politics.... Me. Jul 2017 #7
Have to check this out later underpants Jul 2017 #10

panader0

(25,816 posts)
9. The title of the OP is mieleading is what I mean.
Mon Jul 3, 2017, 08:28 PM
Jul 2017

It says her name appears on the Declaration.
She was a remarkable woman and a brave person.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
11. I understand. She put her name on the published version - at great peril to herself.
Tue Jul 4, 2017, 09:06 AM
Jul 2017

I interpret it as someone proudly contributing to getting this document into the hands of as many people as possible during a dangerous time.

Croney

(4,657 posts)
3. Very interesting article.
Mon Jul 3, 2017, 06:45 PM
Jul 2017

She printed the copies that were first distributed to the colonies. And she was the first female postmaster in the colonies, in 1775.

Igel

(35,296 posts)
8. She was the second printer, actually.
Mon Jul 3, 2017, 07:27 PM
Jul 2017

She was #2. #1 was a man. She owned the press but her brother was the printer.

The USPS says she "may have been" the first woman postmistress. Lack of records, after all. There were others around the same time, and the distinction might have been one of whose name was on the patent. If you're a man and have a post office but are away for 6 months, who do you think runs it?

Seeking validation in firsts isn't a wise use of time, but I get that a lot of people assume they can't do something unless somebody else that they can identify with has gone ahead. Still doesn't strike me was a wise use of time when the problem is a sense of inferiority.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This womans name appears ...