General Discussion

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts) Tue Jul 4, 2017, 10:01 PM Jul 2017

Chris Christie sand sculpture

Jersey Shore sand sculpture mocks Gov. Chris Christie after 4th of July weekend government shutdown https://t.co/m16mX26lRN https://t.co/1rt5537Xdi

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chris Christie sand sculpture (Original Post) Lotusflower70 Jul 2017 OP

Check out the view from the back... HipChick Jul 2017 #1

I Just Hade To Look Grassy Knoll Jul 2017 #4

Christe thongs..... HipChick Jul 2017 #6

Near life size too. Throck Jul 2017 #2

If only the real one would disintegrate as rapidly nt ProudLib72 Jul 2017 #3

.............. LeftInTX Jul 2017 #5

They had to limit the size due to a shortage of sand. keithbvadu2 Jul 2017 #7

Funny Hieronymus Jul 2017 #8

Well done Achilleaze Jul 2017 #9

HipChick

(25,485 posts)

1. Check out the view from the back...

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 10:04 PM

Jul 2017

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)

4. I Just Hade To Look

Reply to HipChick (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 10:44 PM

Jul 2017

HipChick

(25,485 posts)

6. Christe thongs.....

Reply to Grassy Knoll (Reply #4)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 11:06 PM

Jul 2017

Throck

(2,520 posts)

2. Near life size too.

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 10:14 PM

Jul 2017

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)

3. If only the real one would disintegrate as rapidly nt

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 10:44 PM

Jul 2017

LeftInTX

(25,224 posts)

5. ..............

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 11:04 PM

Jul 2017

Link to tweet

keithbvadu2

(36,752 posts)

7. They had to limit the size due to a shortage of sand.

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Tue Jul 4, 2017, 11:45 PM

Jul 2017

Hieronymus

(6,039 posts)

8. Funny

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Wed Jul 5, 2017, 12:33 AM

Jul 2017

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)

9. Well done

Reply to Lotusflower70 (Original post)

Wed Jul 5, 2017, 08:07 AM

Jul 2017

Reply to this discussion