Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Different Drummer

(7,614 posts)
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 03:57 PM Jul 2017

Donald Trumps Populism Decoded: How a Billionaire Became the Voice of the Little People

Source:

Egbertowillies.com


<snip>



A key factor in understanding American populists is their drive to regain a lost status they once held but no longer claim in our economy and culture.

Behavioral economics teaches us that people are far more motivated to avoid a loss than acquire a gain — and invest far more emotion to prevent a loss than benefit from a gain — which suggests that politicians who promise to reaffirm the status of erstwhile dominant constituencies will gain far more enthusiastic support than those who simply promise new and bigger programs to help people pursue their American dream.
And that was precisely the magic behind Donald Trump's 2016 campaign: he promised his supporters that the only way to "make America great again" was by restoring their status as the ones who made America great in the first place — which is exactly how they see themselves.

In particular, white working-class Americans — Donald Trump's base — were a constituency ripe for this message. To them, they were the real heroes of post-World War II America, the ones who made our prosperity and pre-eminence possible. Theirs is a narrative of an American century built by smokestack industries and sturdy white men with a blue-collar, lunch-pail ethic that would come to define the middle class of the post-war years.

<snip>

More at https://egbertowillies.com/2017/07/05/donald-trump-populism-decoded/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Donald Trumps Populism Decoded: How a Billionaire Became the Voice of the Little People (Original Post) Different Drummer Jul 2017 OP
I think this narrative drives resentment of the Clintons and Obamas, too. LisaM Jul 2017 #1
How does that work considering Clinton won the vote of those making under 50,000/year? NCTraveler Jul 2017 #5
I don't mean that in his case, lower-income voters didn't vote for him. LisaM Jul 2017 #8
ALL TIE SMALL HANDS TROPHY WIFE Goonch Jul 2017 #2
Not to mention... Mike Nelson Jul 2017 #3
coz he speaks at a 6th grade level to a bunch of morons. KG Jul 2017 #4
This. n/t Different Drummer Jul 2017 #7
Populism is the wrong word to use.... NCTraveler Jul 2017 #6

LisaM

(27,803 posts)
1. I think this narrative drives resentment of the Clintons and Obamas, too.
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 04:16 PM
Jul 2017

People don't like, generally, comparing themselves to people who really did work their way to the top. They are more comfortable with electing someone who started out rich. I don't really get that, but it's so. Even the Carters were reasonably well to do. I think Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were anomalies (especially since neither had strong father figures). Where does Reagan fit into this? Not sure, though I would say that a lot of people who voted for him may not have been aware of his relatively humble roots and thought of him as a glamorous Hollywood figure.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
5. How does that work considering Clinton won the vote of those making under 50,000/year?
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 04:25 PM
Jul 2017

You literally have to divide it down to income and white men in order to make it a plausible argument.

LisaM

(27,803 posts)
8. I don't mean that in his case, lower-income voters didn't vote for him.
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 04:34 PM
Jul 2017

I'm just stating that the fact that Clinton (and Obama) were essentially self made stirs some resentment in some people.

As we've seen in all recent elections, there is a giant unpredictability factor, too.

Mike Nelson

(9,953 posts)
3. Not to mention...
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 04:22 PM
Jul 2017

...Make America Great Again meant back to a time when there were no Black or female Presidents, no gay people getting married, and no need to learn new computer skills for a job market based on 20th century technology.

...also not to mention that, although Trump was elected, Hillary Clinton won - meaning her message was the most popular.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. Populism is the wrong word to use....
Thu Jul 6, 2017, 04:27 PM
Jul 2017

and is deceptive as hell. Clinton won those making under 50,000 by pretty large numbers. I guess the populist label is only good for some if it's identifying white men.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Donald Trumps Populism De...