Here's the public evidence that supports the idea that Russia interfered in the 2016 election
By Philip Bump July 6 at 3:31 PM
Speaking at a news conference in Warsaw on Thursday, President Trump again cast doubt on the U.S. intelligence communitys assessment that the Russian government tried to intervene in the 2016 presidential election by stealing private files and trying to disrupt voting systems.
I think it was Russia, Trump said, but I think it was probably other people and/or countries, and I see nothing wrong with that statement. Nobody really knows. Nobody really knows for sure.
Theres a lot packed into that statement: a cursory acceptance of the consensus view that Russia was involved, a shadow of doubt overlaid with the idea that Russia didnt act alone, and a blanket shrug at the idea that the truth was really knowable. All of this, of course, comes alongside Trumps repeated dismissal of investigations into what really happened last year as witch hunts because they include a look at how allies of his may have helped the Russians to succeed.
Trumps attempt to soften the accusation against Russia whatever the motivation is helped by the fact that the government agencies involved in the probes relied largely on classified information to find the Russians culpable of meddling. With that in mind, weve cobbled together the publicly available information to demonstrate why a layperson might have reasonable confidence that Russia was behind the election hacks even if Trump, with access to a fuller set of information, does not concur.
The Democratic National Committee hack
In June 2016, The Washington Post reported that the Democratic National Committees computer network had been hacked, allowing access to email and chat transcripts, as well as files detailing research on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/07/06/heres-the-public-evidence-that-supports-the-idea-that-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-election